Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747894›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2023

Short text topic modelling using local and global word-context semantic correlation.

Supriya Kinariwala, Sachin Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Supriya KinariwalaMaharashtra Institute of Technology, Maharashtra Aurangabad, India.
Sachin DeshmukhDr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, people use short text to portray their opinions on platforms of social media such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, as well as on e-commerce websites such as Amazon and Flipkart to share their commercial purchasing experiences. Every day, billions of short texts are created worldwide in tweets, tags, keywords, search queries etc. However, this short text possesses inadequate contextual information, which can be ambiguous, sparse, noisy, remains a major challenge. State-of-the-art strategies of topic modeling such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis are not suitable as it contains a limited number of words in a single document. This work proposes a new model named G_SeaNMF (Gensim_SeaNMF) to improve the word-context semantic relationship by using local and global word embedding techniques. Word embeddings learned from a large corpus provide general semantic and syntactic information about words; it can guide topic modeling for short text collections as supporting information for sparse co-occurrence patterns. In the proposed model, SeaNMF (Semantics-assisted Non-negative Matrix Factorization) is incorporated with word2vec model of Gensim library to strengthen the word's semantic relationship. In this article, a short text topic modeling techniques based on DMM (Dirichlet Multinomial Mixture), self-aggregation and global word co-occurrence were explored. These are evaluated using different measures to gauge cluster coherence on real-world datasets such as Search Snippet, Biomedicine, Pascal Flickr, Tweet and TagMyNews. Empirical evaluation shows that a combination of local and global word embedding provides more appropriate words under each topic with improved outcomes.

Indexed as

Global corpusNon-negative matrix factorizationShort textText miningTopic modellingWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID36747894
PMCPMC9891888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.