ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023
BestCyte® primary screening of 500 ThinPrep Pap Test thin-layers: 3 Cytologists' Interobserver diagnostic concordance with predicate manual microscopy relative to Truth Reference diagnoses defining NILM, ASCUS+, LSIL+, and ASCH+ thresholds for specificity, sensitivity, and equivalency grading.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of Digital Cytology for Primary Diagnosis Across a Range of Specimen Types.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
- Assessment of the efficacy and accuracy of cervical cytology screening with the Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence strengthens cervical cancer screening - present and future.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-driven Digital Cytology-based Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe to Adopt This Disruptive Technology in Resource-constrained Settings? A Literature Review.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The BestCyte® Cell Sorter Imaging System (BestCyte) facilitates algorithmic discrimination of clinically relevant cells in Pap test cytopathology by classifying and projecting images of cells in galleries based on cytomorphology. Warranted is awareness of potential BestCyte advantages as measured through 3 cytologists' interobserver diagnostic concordance, specificity and sensitivity differentials, and equivalency grading relative to manual microscopy (MM). Objectives: Using 500 MM-reported ThinPrep thin-layers, analyze: (1) cytologists' blinded BestCyte screening to raise Bethesda diagnoses; (2) correlate BestCyte and MM diagnoses (i.e., predicate) to establish Truth Reference Diagnoses (TRDx) from concordance between 4 possible diagnoses; (3) analyze cytologists' and MM predicate diagnoses through 4 diagnostic thresholds defined by TRDx: NILM ( Results: 500 TRDx breakdown (n/%): NILM (241/48.2), ASCUS (79/15.8), ASCH (9/1.80), AGUS (2/0.40), LSIL (86/17.2), HSIL (68/13.6), CA (2/0.40), UNSAT (13/2.60). TRDx breakdown (n/%) per 4 of 4, 3 of 4, 2 of 4 diagnostic concordances: 264 (52.8%), 182 (36.4%), 54 (10.8%), respectively. No cases of discordant diagnoses were recorded. HSIL TRDx were established from 66.2% of 4 of 4 concordances, followed by NILM (59.3%), LSIL (46.5%), ASCUS (41.8%); antithetically, from 4.40% of 2 of 4 concordances. Specificity for MM predicate (NILM): 67.08%; for Cytologists 1, 2, and 3: 89.71%, 82.30%, 97.53%, respectively. For NILM threshold, cytologists revealed Conclusions: BestCyte detects and efficiently displays abnormal cells in strategic galleries standardizing objectivity by systematizing mosaics of cell-types for cytologists' consideration. BestCyte fosters consistent, enhanced cytologists' sensitivity values for the ASCUS+, LSIL+, and ASCH+
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.