Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747733›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Using Artificial Intelligence to Learn Optimal Regimen Plan for Alzheimer's Disease.

Kritib Bhattarai, Trisha Das, Yejin Kim, Yongbin Chen, Qiying Dai, Xiaoyang Li, Xiaoqian Jiang, Nansu Zong

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kritib BhattaraiDepartment of Computer Science, Luther College Decorah, IA, United States.
Trisha DasDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Yejin KimSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Yongbin ChenMayo Clinic Rochester, MN, United States.
Qiying DaiMayo Clinic Rochester, MN, United States.
Xiaoyang LiMayo Clinic Rochester, MN, United States.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Nansu ZongSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USLuther College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsR00GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurological disorder with no specific curative medications. While only a few medications are approved by FDA (i.e., donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine) to relieve symptoms (e.g., cognitive decline), sophisticated clinical skills are crucial to optimize the appropriate regimens given the multiple coexisting comorbidities in this patient population. Objective: Here, we propose a study to leverage reinforcement learning (RL) to learn the clinicians' decisions for AD patients based on the longitude records from Electronic Health Records (EHR). Methods: In this study, we withdraw 1,736 patients fulfilling our criteria, from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative(ADNI) database. We focused on the two most frequent concomitant diseases, depression, and hypertension, thus resulting in five main cohorts, 1) whole data, 2) AD-only, 3) AD-hypertension, 4) AD-depression, and 5) AD-hypertension-depression. We modeled the treatment learning into an RL problem by defining the three factors (i.e., states, action, and reward) in RL in multiple strategies, where a regression model and a decision tree are developed to generate states, six main medications extracted (i.e., no drugs, cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, hypertension drugs, a combination of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, and supplements or other drugs) are for action, and Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores are for reward. Results: Given the proper dataset, the RL model can generate an optimal policy (regimen plan) that outperforms the clinician's treatment regimen. With the smallest data samples, the optimal-policy (i.e., policy iteration and Q-learning) gained a lesser reward than the clinician's policy (mean -2.68 and -2.76 Conclusions: Our results highlight the potential of using RL to generate the optimal treatment based on the patients' longitude records. Our work can lead the path toward the development of RL-based decision support systems which could facilitate the daily practice to manage Alzheimer's disease with comorbidities.

Identifiers

PMID36747733
PMCPMC9901063
OpenAlexW4318462488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.