Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747569›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Ling Gan, Lijun Xie, Haiying Li

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling GanDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 20 Chazhong Road, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.
Lijun XieDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 20 Chazhong Road, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.
Haiying LiDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 20 Chazhong Road, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vesicouterine fistula (VUF) is a rare complication after cesarean section. It is challenging to diagnose VUF correctly. Case presentation: A 34-year-old woman complained of recurrent hematuria and urinary tract infection for more than 4 years after cesarean delivery, mostly during menstruation, without vaginal leakage and with a normal menstrual cycle. Conventional transabdominal ultrasound showed no abnormal findings in bilateral kidneys and ureters, bladder and uterus, and transvaginal ultrasound showed that the scar at the lower part of the anterior uterine wall was closely adhered to the posterior wall of the bladder. Considering that the patient had hematuria but no vaginal leakage, we assumed that the fistula was flowing unidirectionally from the uterine cavity to the bladder cavity. Therefore, we chose to inject SonoVue (ultrasound contrast agent) into the uterine cavity rather than into the bladder. After intrauterine injection of SonoVue, the ultrasound contrast agent was seen flowing from the uterine cavity into the bladder cavity through the fistula, showing a hyperechoic fistula between the posterior wall of the bladder and the uterine wall, confirming the diagnosis of VUF. The accuracy of this diagnosis was then further confirmed by both MRI and cystoscopy. Conclusions:

Indexed as

Case reportCEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasoundContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)MRI, magnetic resonance imagingSonoVueUrogenital fistulaVesicouterine fistula (VUF)VUF, vesicouterine fistula

Identifiers

PMID36747569
PMCPMC9898441
OpenAlexW4319289110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.