ArticleHeliyon2023
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a potential way for diagnosing cesarean scar pregnancy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A novel four-step protocol using intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with pelvic floor ultrasound for the diagnosis and preoperative planning of vesicovaginal fistulas.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vesicouterine fistula (VUF) is a rare complication after cesarean section. It is challenging to diagnose VUF correctly. Case presentation: A 34-year-old woman complained of recurrent hematuria and urinary tract infection for more than 4 years after cesarean delivery, mostly during menstruation, without vaginal leakage and with a normal menstrual cycle. Conventional transabdominal ultrasound showed no abnormal findings in bilateral kidneys and ureters, bladder and uterus, and transvaginal ultrasound showed that the scar at the lower part of the anterior uterine wall was closely adhered to the posterior wall of the bladder. Considering that the patient had hematuria but no vaginal leakage, we assumed that the fistula was flowing unidirectionally from the uterine cavity to the bladder cavity. Therefore, we chose to inject SonoVue (ultrasound contrast agent) into the uterine cavity rather than into the bladder. After intrauterine injection of SonoVue, the ultrasound contrast agent was seen flowing from the uterine cavity into the bladder cavity through the fistula, showing a hyperechoic fistula between the posterior wall of the bladder and the uterine wall, confirming the diagnosis of VUF. The accuracy of this diagnosis was then further confirmed by both MRI and cystoscopy. Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.