ArticleHeliyon2023
Multi-head self-attention mechanism enabled individualized hemoglobin prediction and treatment recommendation systems in anemia management for hemodialysis patients.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Total immunoglobulin G concentration as a correlate of anemia in dialysis patients: machine learning analysis of clinical and serological factors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Feasibility study of AI-assisted multi-parameter MRI diagnosis of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deterministic large language model (LLM) framework for safe, protocol-adherent clinical decision support: application in hemodialysis anemia management (AnemiaCare HDs).Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Optimizing anemia management using artificial intelligence for patients undergoing hemodialysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Usage of the Anemia Control Model Is Associated with Reduced Hospitalization Risk in Hemodialysis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anemia is a critical complication in hemodialysis patients, but the response to erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) treatment varies from patient to patient and is not linear across different time points. The aim of this study was to develop deep learning algorithms for individualized anemia management. We retrospectively collected 36,677 data points from 623 hemodialysis patients, including clinical data, laboratory values, hemoglobin levels, and previous ESA doses. To reduce the computational complexity associated with recurrent neural networks (RNN) in processing time-series data, we developed neural networks based on multi-head self-attention mechanisms in an efficient and effective hemoglobin prediction model. Our proposed model achieved a more accurate hemoglobin prediction than the state-of-the-art RNN model, as shown by the smaller mean absolute error (MAE) of hemoglobin (0.451 vs. 0.593 g/dL, p = 0.014). In ESA (including darbepoetin and epoetin) dose recommendation, the simulation results by our model revealed a higher rate of achieved hemoglobin targets (physician prescription vs. model: 86.3 % vs. 92.7 %, p < 0.001), a lower rate of hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL (13.7 % vs. 7.3 %, p < 0.001) and smaller change in hemoglobin levels (0.6 g/dL vs. 0.4 g/dL, p < 0.001) in all patients. Our model holds great potential for individualized anemia management as a computerized clinical decision support system for hemodialysis patients. Further external validation with other datasets and prospective clinical utility studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.