ArticleCancer science2023
Disparities among Japanese municipalities in recommendations for routine and catch-up HPV vaccinations.
Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mothers' intentions for adolescent sons' human papillomavirus vaccination in Japan: Psychosocial factors and relative influences across intention groups.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Evaluating Opt-In Vaginal Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling: Participation Rates and Detection of High-Grade Lesions (CIN2+) among Unscreened Japanese Women Aged 30-39.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intentions for catch-up HPV vaccination in Japan: an internet survey.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Fact-Checking Cancer Information on Social Media in Japan: Retrospective Study Using Twitter.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Disparities among Japanese municipalities in recommendations for routine and catch-up HPV vaccinations.Cancer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In November 2021, the government of Japan announced a reversal of its decision in 2013 to suspend the previous proactive recommendation for HPV vaccination. However, the program for young girls to receive routine and catch-up vaccinations has not necessarily developed as expected. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey by mail in September 2022. The survey was mailed to 133 municipalities consisting of all cities/wards of the Tokyo and Osaka Prefectures and all other prefectural capital cities. Responses were received from 82 municipalities (62.7%). Notification of routine HPV vaccinations had already been sent to 76 (92.7%) of the municipalities; 70 (85.4%) had been encouraged to promote catch-up vaccinations. The questionnaire forms for registration and pre-vaccination screening for routine immunization had been sent to 74.1% (60/81) of the municipalities and 68.8% (55/80) for catch-up immunizations. For catch-up vaccination, only 54 municipalities (65.9%) had detailed vaccination records for those eligible. In total, 10 municipalities (12.2%) had virtually no vaccination records because these had already been discarded. In addition, 61 municipalities (74.4%) had notified only women and girls eligible for a catch-up vaccination based on their vaccination record, whereas 25.6% (21/82) of the municipalities reported that they had sent, or would send, the notification to all women and girls within the targeted grades, including those who had already been vaccinated with three injections. The survey revealed disparities among the municipalities in their HPV vaccine notification processes. Future research on monitoring HPV vaccination rates and incidence rates of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in each municipality will be desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.