Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747252›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2023

Age-specific determinants of psychiatric outcomes after the first COVID-19 wave: baseline findings from a Canadian online cohort study.

S Evelyn Stewart, John Best, Robert Selles, Zainab Naqqash, Boyee Lin, Cynthia Lu, Antony Au, Gaelen Snell, Clara Westwell-Roper, Tanisha Vallani and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S Evelyn StewartDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. evelyn.stewart@ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-9383
John BestDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Robert SellesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zainab NaqqashDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Boyee LinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cynthia LuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Antony AuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gaelen SnellFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Clara Westwell-RoperDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tanisha VallaniBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Elise EwingBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kashish DograDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Quynh DoanBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hasina SamjiBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanadians endured unprecedented mental health (MH) and support access challenges during the first COVID-19 wave. Identifying groups of individuals who remain at risk beyond the acute pandemic phase is key to guiding systemic intervention efforts and policy. We hypothesized that determinants of three complementary, clinically actionable psychiatric outcomes would differ across Canadian age groups.

methodsThe Personal Impacts of COVID-19 Survey (PICS) was iteratively developed with stakeholder feedback, incorporating validated, age-appropriate measures. Baseline, cross-sectional online data collected between November 2020-July 2021 was used in analyses. Age group-specific determinants were sought for three key baseline MH outcomes: (1) current probable depression, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and/or suicide attempt during COVID-19, (2) increased severity of any lifetime psychiatric diagnosis, and (3) inadequate MH support access during COVID-19. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed for children, youth (self- and parent-report), young adults (19-29 years) and adults over 29 years, using survey type as a covariate. Statistical significance was defined by 95% confidence interval excluding an odds ratio of one.

resultsData from 3140 baseline surveys were analyzed. Late adolescence and early adulthood were identified as life phases with the worst MH outcomes. Poverty, limited education, home maker/caregiver roles, female and non-binary gender, LGBTQ2S + status and special educational, psychiatric and medical conditions were differentially identified as determinants across age groups.

interpretationNegative psychiatric impacts of COVID-19 on Canadians that include poor access to MH support clearly persisted beyond the first wave, widening pre-existing inequity gaps. This should guide policy makers and clinicians in current and future prioritization efforts.

Indexed as

AccessAdolescentAgeChildCOVIDDeterminantGenderLGBTQOutcomePovertyPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID36747252
PMCPMC9901839
OpenAlexW4319303505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.