Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747245›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Protocol for a feasibility randomized trial of a social support intervention plus usual care versus usual care, targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness.

Mitti Blakø, Anne Vinggaard Christensen, Ida Elisabeth Højskov, Pernille Palm, Selina Kikkenborg Berg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05503810 (Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05503810 naterminatednot on this map

Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2022 to 2023Enrolled4ConditionsFeasibilityArmsSocial support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitti BlakøDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. mitti.blakoe@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-973X
Anne Vinggaard ChristensenDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth HøjskovDepartment of Heart- and Lung Surgery, RT, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille PalmDepartment of Cardiology B, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Selina Kikkenborg BergDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Helsefonden 20-B-0064Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen og Hustru Astrid Jacobsens Fond J 167/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn patients treated for cardiac disease, loneliness is known to contribute negatively to health behavior, health outcome, and increase risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality. Even so, in health care research, social support interventional studies targeting patients who experience loneliness are lacking.

aimTo determine the feasibility of an individually structured social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness.

designA feasibility study based on randomized clinical trial design with 1:1 randomization to a 6-month social support program, plus usual care (intervention) versus usual care, (i.e., regular guidelines-based follow-up).

interventionPatients classified as high risk lonely according to the High Risk Loneliness tool will be provided with an informal caregiver in the 6 months rehabilitation phase following cardiac disease treatment. The informal caregiver will be designated by the patient from the existing social network or a peer, depending on patients' preferences. The core content of the intervention is through nurse consultations at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months, to enhance and reinforce the informal caregiver's competences to be a social support resource. The theoretical framework of the nurse consultations will be based on middle-range theory of self-care. OUTCOME: Feasibility will be evaluated in terms of acceptability and adherence according to predefined feasibility criteria. The preliminary effect of the intervention on patient-reported outcomes, health behaviors, and health outcomes will be evaluated in the intervention and the control group at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. DISCUSSION: The present study will contribute with knowledge on how to implement a feasible social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness and, furthermore, investigate the preliminary effect on health behavior and health outcome in the early rehabilitation period.

trial registrationThe trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05503810) 18.08.2022.

Indexed as

Cardiac rehabilitationFeasibilityLonelinessSelf-careSocial support

Identifiers

PMID36747245
PMCPMC9900972
OpenAlexW4319319365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.