ArticleBiomarker research2023
Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with grade 3a and grades 1-2 follicular lymphoma: a real-world multicenter study.
Article in Biomarker research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning PET/CT biomarker for early progression (POD24) and survival stratification in follicular lymphoma: a multicenter study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Digital and Manual Assessment of Intrafollicular Ki-67,Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of Ki-67 in grade 3A follicular lymphoma and development of a novel PFS nomogram.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- An explainable transformer model integrating PET and tabular data for histologic grading and prognosis of follicular lymphoma: a multi-institutional digital biopsy study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Molecular landscape of distinct follicular lymphoma histologic grades: insights from genomic and transcriptome analyses.Leukemia · 2025Article
- A machine learning-based model to predict POD24 in follicular lymphoma: a study by the Chinese workshop on follicular lymphoma.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Activation of PPARα Inhibits Transformed Follicular Lymphoma Tumorigenesis via the FOXM1 Signaling Pathway.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Progression-free survival after front line, second line and third line in patients with follicular lymphoma treated in clinical practice.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Prognostic evaluation of system immune-inflammatory index and prognostic nutritional index in double expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe difference between clinical characteristics and outcomes between follicular lymphoma grade 1-2 (FL1-2) and FL3a defined pathologically remains unclear, resulting in uncertainty how to treat FL3a. However, it may be crucial for clinicians to discriminate grade 3a and grade 1-2 for predicting prognosis and thus making treatment decisions.
methodsWe compared 1403 patients with FL1-2 and 765 patients with FL3a diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2020 from fifteen centers nationwide in China to describe differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes.
resultsCompared with FL1-2 patients, FL3a subgroup had a higher percentage of elderly patients (P = 0.003), and relatively more FL3a patients presented with increased levels of LDH (P < 0.0001) and higher Ki-67 indexs greater than 30% (P < 0.001). More FL3a patients were treated with CHOP ± R (P < 0.0001), and fewer were treated with the watchful-waiting approach (P < 0.0001). The results showed a higher incidence of relapse among FL3a patients, in which more patients underwent histological transformation (HT) when compared to FL1-2 (P = 0.003). 1470 (76.2%) patients of the entire cohort received R-CHOP therapy; survival analysis revealed that FL3a patients had a worse progression-free survival (PFS) rate than FL1-2 patients. Survival of FL3a patients with respect to FLIPI showed an inferior PFS in the intermediate and high-risk groups than FL1-2 patients. FL3a patients had a much worse prognosis than FL1-2 with or without progression of disease within 24 months (POD24). FL3a patients had higher likelihood of lymphoma-related death (LRD, P < 0.05), whereas the rates for non-LRD were comparable.
conclusionIn conclusion, this study demonstrates a marked difference in clinical features and outcomes in FL3a patients compared with FL1-2 patients. The results highlight the need for applying therapeutic approaches distinct from FL1-2 when treating FL3a patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.