Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747226›Full record

ArticleBiomarker research2023

Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with grade 3a and grades 1-2 follicular lymphoma: a real-world multicenter study.

Jie Zha, Qinwei Chen, Jingjing Ye, Haifeng Yu, Shuhua Yi, Zhong Zheng, Wei Xu, Zhifeng Li, Lingyan Ping, Xiaohua He and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital and Manual Assessment of Intrafollicular Ki-67,Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jie Zha *Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China.
Qinwei Chen *Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China.
Jingjing Ye *Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Haifeng YuDepartment of Lymphoma, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Shuhua YiState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Blood Diseases Hospital & Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Zhong ZhengShanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zhifeng LiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China.
Lingyan PingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Liling ZhangCancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Caixia LiNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ying Xie15Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Feili ChenLymphoma Division, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiuhua SunSecond Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Liping SuShanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Huilai ZhangDepartment of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Liyuan FanDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China.
Zhijuan LinDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China.
Haiyan YangDepartment of Lymphoma, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Weili ZhaoShanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lugui QiuDepartment of Lymphoma, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Zhiming LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. lizhm@sysucc.org.cn.
Yuqin SongKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. songyuqin622@163.com.
Bing XuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, P.R, China. xubing@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Key R&D  Program  of  Jiangsu Province BE2019798Lymphoma Research Fund of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association CORP-117National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFC0840604National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170180, 82170182, 82020108003, 81800163, 81770161, 81730003the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD),and the Suzhou Science and Technology Program Project SLT201911Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology 3502Z20209003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe difference between clinical characteristics and outcomes between follicular lymphoma grade 1-2 (FL1-2) and FL3a defined pathologically remains unclear, resulting in uncertainty how to treat FL3a. However, it may be crucial for clinicians to discriminate grade 3a and grade 1-2 for predicting prognosis and thus making treatment decisions.

methodsWe compared 1403 patients with FL1-2 and 765 patients with FL3a diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2020 from fifteen centers nationwide in China to describe differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes.

resultsCompared with FL1-2 patients, FL3a subgroup had a higher percentage of elderly patients (P = 0.003), and relatively more FL3a patients presented with increased levels of LDH (P < 0.0001) and higher Ki-67 indexs greater than 30% (P < 0.001). More FL3a patients were treated with CHOP ± R (P < 0.0001), and fewer were treated with the watchful-waiting approach (P < 0.0001). The results showed a higher incidence of relapse among FL3a patients, in which more patients underwent histological transformation (HT) when compared to FL1-2 (P = 0.003). 1470 (76.2%) patients of the entire cohort received R-CHOP therapy; survival analysis revealed that FL3a patients had a worse progression-free survival (PFS) rate than FL1-2 patients. Survival of FL3a patients with respect to FLIPI showed an inferior PFS in the intermediate and high-risk groups than FL1-2 patients. FL3a patients had a much worse prognosis than FL1-2 with or without progression of disease within 24 months (POD24). FL3a patients had higher likelihood of lymphoma-related death (LRD, P < 0.05), whereas the rates for non-LRD were comparable.

conclusionIn conclusion, this study demonstrates a marked difference in clinical features and outcomes in FL3a patients compared with FL1-2 patients. The results highlight the need for applying therapeutic approaches distinct from FL1-2 when treating FL3a patients.

Indexed as

Clinical featureFollicular lymphomaHistological gradingHistological transformationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID36747226
PMCPMC9901161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.