Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747197›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2023

Characterization of the population affiliated to the subsidized health insurance scheme in Colombia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Mora-Moreo, Kelly Estrada-Orozco, Oscar Espinosa, Lorena Mesa Melgarejo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of Maternity Rights Perception: Impact of Maternal Care in Diverse Socio-Health Contexts.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Mora-MoreoEpidemiology, Evidence Synthesis and Technology Management, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, Colombia.
Kelly Estrada-OrozcoDirectorate of Evidence Synthesis and Management of Health Technologies, Institutode Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. kpestradao@unal.edu.co.
Oscar EspinosaDirectorate of Analytical, Economic and Actuarial Studies at Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Lorena Mesa MelgarejoDirectorate of Qualitative Methods and Social Research, Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome reports suggest there are differences in health needs between the population affiliated to the subsidized health insurance scheme (SS) and those affiliated to the contributory health insurance scheme (CS) in Colombia. The objective of this study was to identify the epidemiological profile of the population affiliated to the SS in Colombia and to compare the main epidemiological features of the SS to the CS.

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology, the search was carried out from 1993, with no other restriction. The information was synthesized into five categories according to the most important risk populations. We estimated combined incidences from epidemiological surveillance data, prevalence ratio, and other measures to estimate the difference between the studied groups. A 95% confidence interval was considered. A random effects model was used weighted by the inverse of the variance of the cumulative incidence calculated for each disease. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools.

resultsA total of 16,236 articles were identified; 14,972 were excluded after title and abstract screening, 725 articles were verified as full text, and finally 268 articles were included. The relative risk of non-communicable and communicable diseases was lower in the SS than in the CS (RR: 0.37 and 0.72, respectively, p-value < 0.05). However, the risk of presenting obstetric and maternal conditions in the SS versus the CS was RR 1.55 for frequent conditions during early childhood, and for other diseases it was RR 1.28 with a p-value of < 0.05. The use of health services was different by scheme, with less demand, access, and provision being found in health services in the SS.

conclusionsThis study allowed us to conclude that there are differences in the incidence, prevalence, and use of health services between health affiliation schemes (SS and CS) in Colombia, thereby assisting in decision-making for stakeholders.

trial registrationPROSPERO Registration number CRD42021279234.

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthChild, PreschoolColombiaFemaleHumansIncidencePregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsEpidemiological factorsEpidemiologyGlobal healthPublic healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID36747197
PMCPMC9903445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.