Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747194›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Cost and community acceptability of enhanced antibiotic distribution approaches for trachoma in the Republic of South Sudan: enhancing the A in SAFE (ETAS) study protocol.

Angelia M Sanders, Samuel Makoy, Andrew R Deathe, Stephen Ohidor, Timothy C Jesudason, Andrew W Nute, Patrick Odongi, Lochebe Boniface, Stella Abuba, Alexis S Delahaut and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelia M SandersThe Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. angelia.sanders@cartercenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-0303
Samuel MakoyMinistry of Health, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Andrew R DeatheThe Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen OhidorThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Timothy C JesudasonPartners in Global Health Ltd, Dereham, UK.
Andrew W NuteThe Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Patrick OdongiThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Lochebe BonifaceThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Stella AbubaThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Alexis S DelahautThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Wilson SebitMinistry of Health, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
James NiquetteThe Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
E Kelly CallahanThe Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Damian G WalkerIndependent Contractor, Arlington, VA, USA.
Scott D NashThe Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carter Center · USIndependent Sector · USKings Health Partners · GB

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization targeted trachoma for global elimination as a public health problem by 2030. Reaching elimination thresholds by the year 2030 in the Republic of South Sudan will be a considerable challenge, as the country currently has many counties considered hyper-endemic (> 30% trachomatous inflammation-follicular [TF]) that have yet to receive interventions. Evidence from randomized trials, modeling, and population-based surveys suggests that enhancements may be needed to the standard-of-care annual mass drug administration (MDA) to reach elimination thresholds in a timely manner within highly endemic areas. We describe a protocol for a study to determine the cost and community acceptability of enhanced antibiotic strategies for trachoma in South Sudan.

methodsThe Enhancing the A in SAFE (ETAS) study is a community randomized intervention costing and community acceptability study. Following a population-based trachoma prevalence survey in 1 county, 30 communities will be randomized 1:1 to receive 1 of 2 enhanced MDA interventions, with the remaining communities receiving standard-of-care annual MDA. The first intervention strategy will consist of a community-wide MDA followed by 2 rounds of targeted treatment to children ages 6 months to 9 years, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the community MDA. The second strategy will consist of a community-wide biannual MDA approximately 6 to 8 months apart. The costing analysis will use a payer perspective and identify the total cost of the enhanced interventions and annual MDA. Community acceptability will be assessed through MDA coverage monitoring and mixed-methods research involving community stakeholders. A second trachoma-specific survey will be conducted 12 months following the original survey. DISCUSSION: ETAS has received ethical clearance and is expected to be conducted between 2022 and 2023. Results will be shared through subsequent manuscripts. The study's results will provide information to trachoma programs on whether enhanced interventions are affordable and acceptable to communities. These results will further help in the design of future trachoma-specific antibiotic efficacy trials. Enhanced MDA approaches could help countries recover from delays caused by conflict or humanitarian emergencies and could also assist countries such as South Sudan in reaching trachoma elimination as a public health problem by 2030.

trial registrationThis trial was registered on December 1

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsTrachomaChildHumansInfantInflammationPrevalenceSouth SudanSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMass drug administrationSouth SudanTrachoma

Identifiers

PMID36747194
PMCPMC9900535
OpenAlexW4319298464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.