ArticleBMC oral health2023
Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT.
Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular posterior region -A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- CBCT-based submandibular fossa depth classification and panoramic fractal dimension analysis in the posterior mandible.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Based on Swin-Transformer and 3D U-Net: Implant Three-Dimensional Position Planning.International dental journal · 2026Article
- CBCT-based virtual surgical planning for predicting risk factors and preventive strategies of buccal plate perforation in maxillary premolar implant placement.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- A Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Gated Fusion Framework for AI-Driven Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation and Mandibular Canal Injury in Posterior Mandible Implants.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Morphological and cortical bone assessment of the edentulous posterior mandible using CBCT Implications for implant planning and mandibular cortical index evaluation.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- CBCT dual-center investigation of relationship between the inferior alveolar canal and the lingual mandibular depression of the submandibular salivary glands.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Treatment Planning for Single-Tooth Implant: A Clinical Guide and Literature Review.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- CBCT data relevant in treatment planning for immediate mandibular molar implant placement.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of submandibular fossa depth and mandibular canal relationship with cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Lingual Concavities in Posterior Mandible: Retrospective Morphometric Analysis in Relation to Gender and Tooth Loss.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Factors influencing submandibular fossa visibility on panoramic images: a comparative CBCT study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- The prevalence of mandibular lingual concavity among the Saudi population of Eastern Province: A CBCT evaluation.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Incidental Findings Following Dental Implant Procedures in the Mandible: A New Post-Processing CBCT Software Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Accuracy in osteotomy drilling using a new universal and disposable drill-stop device for dental implant drills: an in vitro study using a bovine rib model.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2024Article
- The mylohyoid line is highly variable but does not affect the microarchitecture of the edentulous alveolar bone - an anatomical micro-CT study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Quantitative and qualitative 3D analysis of mandibular lingual concavities: Implications for dental implant planning in the posterior mandible.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP).
methods181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each cross-section of the implantation site was divided into the Undercut (U)/Parallel (P)/Convex (C) types. Morphologically relevant parameters were measured on the cross-sections, including width of the upper end (Wb), width of the lower end (Wc), vertical height (V), angle between the natural crown axis and the alveolar bone axis (∠β), LC depth (LCD), LC height, and angle between the horizontal line and the line connecting the most prominent point and the most concave point of lingual plate (∠α). Besides, the distance from the end of the virtual implant and the lingual bone plate of the cross-section (D
resultsA total of 77 (42.5%) cross-sections were classified as U-type, which was the most common one, accounting for 63% of the second molar regions. All LPP cases and most of the nearly LPP (87.9%) cases occurred at the U-type cross-sections, and the relationship between the D
conclusionsThe occurrence rate of U-type cross-sections in the second molar region was very high, and the risk of LPP should be considered during IIP. Except for the U-type, significant large LCD, small Wc, and large ∠β were the important relevant factors. CBCT and multivariate linear equations could help to assess the LPP risk and provide a reference for implant placement design pre-surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.