Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747139›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2023

Evaluate prognostic accuracy of SOFA component score for mortality among adults with sepsis by machine learning method.

Xiaobin Pan, Jinbao Xie, Lihui Zhang, Xincai Wang, Shujuan Zhang, Yingfeng Zhuang, Xingsheng Lin, Songjing Shi, Songchang Shi, Wei Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ferroptosis in heatstroke: Mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sepsis Prediction: Biomarkers Combined in a Bayesian Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. SOFA in sepsis: with or without GCS.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaobin Pan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jinbao Xie *Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Lihui ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xincai WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shujuan ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yingfeng ZhuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xingsheng LinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Songjing ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China. Songjingshifz@163.com.
Songchang ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Jinshan Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China. songchangshi81@163.com.
Wei LinDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China. caolalin0929@163.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province No.2020J01 1068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis has the characteristics of high incidence, high mortality of ICU patients. Early assessment of disease severity and risk stratification of death in patients with sepsis, and further targeted intervention are very important. The purpose of this study was to develop machine learning models based on sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) components to early predict in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and evaluate model performance.

methodsPatients admitted to ICU with sepsis diagnosis were extracted from MIMIC-IV database for retrospective analysis, and were randomly divided into training set and test set in accordance with 2:1. Six variables were included in this study, all of which were from the scores of 6 organ systems in SOFA score. The machine learning model was trained in the training set and evaluated in the validation set. Six machine learning methods including linear regression analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Logistic regression analysis (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) and support vector machines (SVM) were used to construct the death risk prediction models, and the accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and K-fold cross-validation were used to evaluate the prediction performance of developed models.

resultA total of 23,889 patients with sepsis were enrolled, of whom 3659 died in hospital. Three feature variables including renal system score, central nervous system score and cardio vascular system score were used to establish prediction models. The accuracy of the LR, GNB, SVM were 0.851, 0.844 and 0.862, respectively, which were better than linear regression analysis (0.123) and LASSO (0.130). The AUROCs of LR, GNB and SVM were 0.76, 0.76 and 0.67, respectively. K-fold cross validation showed that the average AUROCs of LR, GNB and SVM were 0.757 ± 0.005, 0.762 ± 0.006, 0.630 ± 0.013, respectively. For the probability threshold of 5-50%, LY and GNB models both showed positive net benefits.

conclusionThe two machine learning-based models (LR and GNB models) based on SOFA components can be used to predict in-hospital mortality of septic patients admitted to ICU.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresSepsisAdultBayes TheoremHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveHospital mortalityIntensive care unitMachine learningSepsisSequential organ failure assessment

Identifiers

PMID36747139
PMCPMC9903420
OpenAlexW4319310850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.