SynthesisBMC medical imaging2023
Diagnosis value of
Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary pulmonary meningioma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in atypical pulmonary hamartoma and pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Large mesenchymal cystic and chondroid pulmonary hamartoma mimicking lung cancer: Case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe diagnosis of pulmonary hamartoma (PH) based on computed tomography (CT) is a challenge, especially in patients with atypical imaging characteristics. This study was aimed at summarizing the imaging characteristic of DATA AND
methodsPatients diagnosed with PH who had undergone PET-CT from literature pertaining were retrospectively analyzed, which were cases of publications from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases, from 2008 to June 2022. The other 20 cases of the collection were patients from our hospital from 2008 to June 2022. Patients' symptoms, imaging characteristics of chest CT, PET-CT characteristics, the reason for PET-CT and the complications were analyzed.
resultsIn this retrospective study, a total of 216 patients were diagnosed with PH and had been examined by PET-CT. 20 of the cases were patients of our hospital from January 2008 to June 2022. The other cases were collected from the literature. The mean diameter of most PH lesions is 1.7 ± 1.0 cm. The mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the PH lesions was 1.2 ± 1.1. Most of their SUVmax were lower than internationally recognized cut-off value (SUVmax = 2.5). PET-CT was superior to CT in the diagnosis of PH but there was a correlation of between CT diagnosis and PET-CT diagnosis for the PH lesions. In order to draw the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), we selected 29 patients with a clear SUVmax value of their PH lesion, and 29 lung cancer patients with clear SUVmax value in our hospital were collected as a control group. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) of SUVmax was 0.899, and the optimal diagnostic threshold was SUVmax > 2.65. PET-CT could distinguish PH from malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 89.66% by applying a SUVmax of 2.65 as a cut-off in this study.
conclusionPET-CT might be a useful tool to diagnose PH, which shows a better diagnostic sensitivity than CT. But PET-CT can not be used as a single diagnostic approach, which should be combined with other methods and the patients' history to make the most correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.