Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747119›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of different local anesthetic volumes for erector spinae plane block in thoracotomy patients; a prospective randomized trial.

Musa Zengin, Hilal Sazak, Ramazan Baldemir, Gulay Ulger, Dilara Arican, Oya Kaybal, Ali Alagoz

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Musa ZenginUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey. musazengin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2249-6521
Hilal SazakUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-7861
Ramazan BaldemirUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-4277
Gulay UlgerUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-4770
Dilara AricanUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-4542
Oya KaybalUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-6730
Ali AlagozUniversity of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Kuşcağız Mah. Sanatoryum Cad. No: 271, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-2213
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAnkara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a thoracic wall block that has been used frequently in recent years. It was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in different volumes for ESPB in patients undergoing thoracotomy.

methodsPatients who were in the age range of 18 to 65 years, ASA I-III, had a body mass index (BMI) of 18-30 kg/m

resultsVisual analog scale (VAS) resting scores, the 1

conclusionsThe results of ESPB applied with 20 ml and 30 ml of local anesthetic before the surgical incision in thoracotomy patients showed that the use of 30 ml of local anesthetic provided more effective analgesia. In addition, similar side-effect rates show that 30 ml of local anesthetic can be used safely.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalNerve BlockAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsBupivacaineHumansMiddle AgedMorphinePostoperative PainProspective StudiesThoracotomyYoung AdultAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineMorphineAcute painErector spinae plane blockLocal anesthetic volumePostoperative painThoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID36747119
PMCPMC9901132
OpenAlexW4319319529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.