Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

AI-accelerated protein-ligand docking for SARS-CoV-2 is 100-fold faster with no significant change in detection.

Austin Clyde, Xuefeng Liu, Thomas Brettin, Hyunseung Yoo, Alexander Partin, Yadu Babuji, Ben Blaiszik, Jamaludin Mohd-Yusof, Andre Merzky, Matteo Turilli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Scoring Function Space with Lasso Regression.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Considerations Around Structure-Based Drug Discovery for KRAS Using DOCK.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Austin Clyde *Argonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Chicago, Lemont, 60439, USA. aclyde@anl.gov.
Xuefeng Liu *Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, USA.
Thomas BrettinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, USA.
Hyunseung YooArgonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Chicago, Lemont, 60439, USA.
Alexander PartinArgonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Chicago, Lemont, 60439, USA.
Yadu BabujiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, USA.
Ben BlaiszikArgonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Chicago, Lemont, 60439, USA.
Jamaludin Mohd-YusofLos Alamos National Laboratory, Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences, Los Alamos, 87545, USA.
Andre MerzkyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, 08854, USA.
Matteo TurilliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, 08854, USA.
Shantenu JhaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, 08854, USA.
Arvind RamanathanArgonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Chicago, Lemont, 60439, USA.
Rick StevensDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, USA.
Argonne National Laboratory · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Chicago · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand docking is a computational method for identifying drug leads. The method is capable of narrowing a vast library of compounds down to a tractable size for downstream simulation or experimental testing and is widely used in drug discovery. While there has been progress in accelerating scoring of compounds with artificial intelligence, few works have bridged these successes back to the virtual screening community in terms of utility and forward-looking development. We demonstrate the power of high-speed ML models by scoring 1 billion molecules in under a day (50 k predictions per GPU seconds). We showcase a workflow for docking utilizing surrogate AI-based models as a pre-filter to a standard docking workflow. Our workflow is ten times faster at screening a library of compounds than the standard technique, with an error rate less than 0.01% of detecting the underlying best scoring 0.1% of compounds. Our analysis of the speedup explains that another order of magnitude speedup must come from model accuracy rather than computing speed. In order to drive another order of magnitude of acceleration, we share a benchmark dataset consisting of 200 million 3D complex structures and 2D structure scores across a consistent set of 13 million "in-stock" molecules over 15 receptors, or binding sites, across the SARS-CoV-2 proteome. We believe this is strong evidence for the community to begin focusing on improving the accuracy of surrogate models to improve the ability to screen massive compound libraries 100 × or even 1000 × faster than current techniques and reduce missing top hits. The technique outlined aims to be a fast drop-in replacement for docking for screening billion-scale molecular libraries.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Artificial IntelligenceHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36747041
PMCPMC9901402
OpenAlexW4319298178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.