Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36746985›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2023

COMFORTneo scale: a reliable and valid instrument to measure prolonged pain in neonates?

Naomi J Meesters, Tinne Dilles, Joost van Rosmalen, Gerbrich E van den Bosch, Sinno H P Simons, Monique van Dijk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06985290 (Comparative Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine in Alleviating Secondary Brain Injury, When Used for Sedation During Hypothermia Therapy in Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06985290 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine in Alleviating Secondary Brain Injury, When Used for Sedation During Hypothermia Therapy in Neonates: A Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIpsita GoswamiRan2025 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsHypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury, Neonatal Encephalopathy, Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain InjuryArmsDexmedetomidine Infusion, Morphine Infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naomi J MeestersDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC -Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. n.meesters@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-173X
Tinne DillesNursing and Midwifery Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Joost van RosmalenDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-244X
Gerbrich E van den BoschDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC -Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sinno H P SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC -Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique van DijkDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC -Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe studied the reliability and validity of the COMFORTneo scale, designed to measure neonatal prolonged pain. STUDY

designThis prospective observational study evaluated four clinimetric properties of the COMFORTneo scale from NICU nurses' assessments of neonates' pain. Intra-rater reliability was determined from three video fragments at two time points. Inter-rater reliability and construct validity were determined in five neonates per nurse with the COMFORTneo and numeric rating scales (NRS) for pain and distress. Pain scores using N-PASS were correlated with COMFORTneo scores to further evaluate construct validity.

resultIntra-rater reliability: Twenty-two nurses assessed pain twice with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.70. Inter-rater reliability: The ICC for 310 COMFORTneo scores together with 62 nurses was 0.93. Construct validity: Correlation between COMFORTneo and NRS pain, distress, and N-PASS was 0.34, 0.72, and 0.70, respectively.

conclusionThe COMFORTneo can be used to reliably and validly assess pain in NICU patients.

Indexed as

PainHumansInfant, NewbornPain MeasurementProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.