ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2023
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.
Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative supraglottic airway device, anesthetic, and mechanical factors associated with acute postoperative sore throat in elective tympanoplasty: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Gastric tube placement through the drainage channel of second-generation supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review with evidence mapping.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparative analysis of LMA BlockbusterIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Clinical Performance of I-gelInternational journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia.Among SGA, I-gelTM is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This studywas conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM LMA in pediatric patients.
methodsA total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery,were randomized into two groups either I-gelTM (Group I) or BlockbusterTM LMA (Group B). Airway was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under generalanesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), andsecondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease ofLMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities.
resultsThe mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gelTM compared to BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97 ± 1.65 vs. 26.04 ± 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on thefirst attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time,ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were comparable between groups.
conclusionsThe I-gelTM was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than BlockbusterTMLMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.