ArticleInsights into imaging2023
MRI texture-based machine learning models for the evaluation of renal function on different segmentations: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multimodal MRI-based two-stage artificial intelligence framework for renal fibrosis classification in chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- The role of texture analysis of T1 weighted images in diagnosis of chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A practical guide for nephrologist peer reviewers: evaluating artificial intelligence and machine learning research in nephrology.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Predicting esophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy with magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- MRI-Based Radiomics to Predict Renal Function Response to Renal Artery Stenting for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Multi-parametric MRI-based machine learning model for prediction of pathological grade of renal injury in a rat kidney cold ischemia-reperfusion injury model.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography for measuring split kidney function in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis: comparison with renal scintigraphy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Radiomic texture analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging to differentiate glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Kidney Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery Selection by Machine Learning from CT Scans Combined with Clinical Metadata.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and validate an MRI texture-based machine learning model for the noninvasive assessment of renal function.
methodsA retrospective study of 174 diabetic patients (training cohort, n = 123; validation cohort, n = 51) who underwent renal MRI scans was included. They were assigned to normal function (n = 71), mild or moderate impairment (n = 69), and severe impairment groups (n = 34) according to renal function. Four methods of kidney segmentation on T2-weighted images (T2WI) were compared, including regions of interest covering all coronal slices (All-K), the largest coronal slices (LC-K), and subregions of the largest coronal slices (TLCO-K and PIZZA-K). The speeded-up robust features (SURF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were used for texture feature extraction and model construction, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of models.
resultsThe models based on LC-K and All-K achieved the nonsignificantly highest accuracy in the classification of renal function (all p values > 0.05). The optimal model yielded high performance in classifying the normal function, mild or moderate impairment, and severe impairment, with an area under the curve of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.935-0.940), 0.919 (95%CI 0.916-0.922), and 0.959 (95%CI 0.956-0.962) in the training cohorts, respectively, as well as 0.802 (95%CI 0.800-0.807), 0.852 (95%CI 0.846-0.857), and 0.863 (95%CI 0.857-0.887) in the validation cohorts, respectively.
conclusionWe developed and internally validated an MRI-based machine-learning model that can accurately evaluate renal function. Once externally validated, this model has the potential to facilitate the monitoring of patients with impaired renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.