Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36746892›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

MRI texture-based machine learning models for the evaluation of renal function on different segmentations: a proof-of-concept study.

Xiaokai Mo, Wenbo Chen, Simin Chen, Zhuozhi Chen, Yuanshu Guo, Yulian Chen, Xuewei Wu, Lu Zhang, Qiuying Chen, Zhe Jin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaokai Mo *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenbo Chen *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Simin ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhuozhi ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuanshu GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yulian ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xuewei WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qiuying ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhe JinDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Minmin LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Luyan ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing YouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyuan XiongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. xld_jane_eyre@126.com.
Shuixing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. shui7515@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-382X
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNHuizhou Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801665National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871323National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901709Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018B030311024Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515011918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate an MRI texture-based machine learning model for the noninvasive assessment of renal function.

methodsA retrospective study of 174 diabetic patients (training cohort, n = 123; validation cohort, n = 51) who underwent renal MRI scans was included. They were assigned to normal function (n = 71), mild or moderate impairment (n = 69), and severe impairment groups (n = 34) according to renal function. Four methods of kidney segmentation on T2-weighted images (T2WI) were compared, including regions of interest covering all coronal slices (All-K), the largest coronal slices (LC-K), and subregions of the largest coronal slices (TLCO-K and PIZZA-K). The speeded-up robust features (SURF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were used for texture feature extraction and model construction, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of models.

resultsThe models based on LC-K and All-K achieved the nonsignificantly highest accuracy in the classification of renal function (all p values > 0.05). The optimal model yielded high performance in classifying the normal function, mild or moderate impairment, and severe impairment, with an area under the curve of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.935-0.940), 0.919 (95%CI 0.916-0.922), and 0.959 (95%CI 0.956-0.962) in the training cohorts, respectively, as well as 0.802 (95%CI 0.800-0.807), 0.852 (95%CI 0.846-0.857), and 0.863 (95%CI 0.857-0.887) in the validation cohorts, respectively.

conclusionWe developed and internally validated an MRI-based machine-learning model that can accurately evaluate renal function. Once externally validated, this model has the potential to facilitate the monitoring of patients with impaired renal function.

Indexed as

Chronic renal insufficiencyGlomerular filtration rateMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID36746892
PMCPMC9902579
OpenAlexW4319311396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.