ArticleNeurology2023
Clinical Reasoning: A Teenager With Chronic Meningitis-Does Occam's Razor Apply?
Article in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 14-year-old girl presented with subacute onset headache, fever, and vomiting and was managed initially with antibiotics for suspected bacterial meningitis. Her symptoms further evolved over the next few weeks with systemic signs and symptoms favoring chronic meningitis with raised intracranial pressure. After the etiologic workup was unrevealing, she was started on empirical antituberculous therapy. After a period of partial improvement, symptoms recurred with a new-onset focal seizure. Her imaging findings evolved from features suggestive of focal leptomeningitis to multifocal heterogeneous enhancing cortical and subcortical lesions with hemorrhagic foci, leading to brain biopsy that confirmed diagnosis. Our case highlights the utility of diagnostic biopsy in patients with "chronic meningitis" in uncertain cases rather than confining the approach to the law of parsimony. The decision to initiate empirical therapy in chronic meningitis should be considered on a case-by-case basis and take into account factors, such as clinical examination findings, immune status, recent exposures, and potential risks of treatment. Atypical MRI features should lower the threshold for meningocortical biopsy when indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.