Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36746606›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2023

PLK1 regulates CtIP and DNA2 interplay in long-range DNA end resection.

Ilaria Ceppi, Elda Cannavo, Hélène Bret, Rosa Camarillo, Francesca Vivalda, Roshan Singh Thakur, Amador Romero-Franco, Alessandro A Sartori, Pablo Huertas, Raphaël Guérois and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilaria CeppiInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland.
Elda CannavoInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland.
Hélène BretInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.
Rosa CamarilloDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla 41080, Spain.
Francesca VivaldaInstitute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.
Roshan Singh ThakurInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland.
Amador Romero-FrancoDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla 41080, Spain.
Alessandro A SartoriInstitute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-0333
Pablo HuertasDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla 41080, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-4449
Raphaël GuéroisInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-2858
Petr CejkaInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland; petr.cejka@irb.usi.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-032X
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CHUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is initiated by DNA end resection. CtIP acts in short-range resection to stimulate MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) to endonucleolytically cleave 5'-terminated DNA to bypass protein blocks. CtIP also promotes the DNA2 helicase-nuclease to accelerate long-range resection downstream from MRN. Here, using AlphaFold2, we identified CtIP-F728E-Y736E as a separation-of-function mutant that is still proficient in conjunction with MRN but is not able to stimulate ssDNA degradation by DNA2. Accordingly, CtIP-F728E-Y736E impairs physical interaction with DNA2. Cellular assays revealed that CtIP-F728E-Y736E cells exhibit reduced DSB-dependent chromatin-bound RPA, impaired long-range resection, and increased sensitivity to DSB-inducing drugs. Previously, CtIP was shown to be targeted by PLK1 to inhibit long-range resection, yet the underlying mechanism was unclear. We show that the DNA2-interacting region in CtIP includes the PLK1 target site at S723. The integrity of S723 in CtIP is necessary for the stimulation of DNA2, and phosphorylation of CtIP by PLK1 in vitro is consequently inhibitory, explaining why PLK1 restricts long-range resection. Our data support a model in which CDK-dependent phosphorylation of CtIP activates resection by MRN in S phase, and PLK1-mediated phosphorylation of CtIP disrupts CtIP stimulation of DNA2 to attenuate long-range resection later at G2/M.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNADNA HelicasesDNA RepairEndodeoxyribonucleasesCarrier ProteinsDNADNA HelicasesEndodeoxyribonucleasesDNA end resectionDNA repairhomologous recombinationphosphorylation

Identifiers

PMID36746606
PMCPMC10069449
OpenAlexW4319304796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.