Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36746531›Full record

ArticleRMD open2023

Progression from suspected to definite systemic sclerosis and the role of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies.

Sophie I E Liem, Sam Neppelenbroek, Cynthia M Fehres, Brigitte A Wevers, René E M Toes, Cornelia F Allaart, Tom W J Huizinga, Hans Ulrich Scherer, Jeska K De Vries-Bouwstra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie I E LiemDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands S.I.E.Liem@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-7062
Sam NeppelenbroekDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9582-2837
Cynthia M FehresDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Brigitte A WeversDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
René E M ToesDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-6414
Cornelia F AllaartDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tom W J HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-7520
Hans Ulrich SchererDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-5617
Jeska K De Vries-BouwstraDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is important to start therapeutic interventions timely. Important risk factors for progression to SSc are the SSc-specific autoantibodies, of whom anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) are the most frequent. ATA is associated with a severe disease course. A more detailed characterisation of the ATA-response in SSc might increase insights in preclinical disease stages and improve prognostication. To address this we identified all patients with suspected very early ATA-positive SSc, defined as all patients who are ATA-positive not fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2013 criteria, in the Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sclerosis (CCISS)-cohort and found very low numbers.

methodsThis triggered us to search the literature on the ATA prevalence in patients with suspected very early SSc and contribution of the SSc-specific autoantibodies to progression from suspected very early to definite SSc. To increase insights on the ATA-response in suspected very early SSc, we then evaluated the association between the ATA-response and time between onset of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and first non-RP symptom, as a proxy for progressing to definite SSc, in all patients with ATA-positive SSc from the Leiden CCISS-cohort.

resultsIn short, included studies show that prevalence of ATA is much lower in suspected very early SSc than in populations fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria. After 1-15 years of follow-up, only 52% of the patients with suspected very early SSc progress to definite SSc. ATA-IgG levels tend to be higher in patients with ATA-positive SSc with more rapid disease progression.

conclusionAlthough a role of ATA in disease progression is suggested, more studies on the ATA response in suspected very early SSc are warranted.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesRaynaud DiseaseScleroderma, SystemicDisease ProgressionDNA Topoisomerases, Type IHumansUnited StatesAutoantibodiesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityScleroderma, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID36746531
PMCPMC9906376
OpenAlexW4319312029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.