Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36746471›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Incorporating FRAX into a nurse-delivered integrated care review: a multi-method qualitative study.

Ashley Hawarden, Laurna Bullock, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Daniel Herron, Samantha Hider, Clare Jinks, Risni Erandie Ediriweera De Silva, Annabelle Machin, Zoe Paskins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley HawardenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK a.hawarden@keele.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-579X
Laurna BullockSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Daniel HerronDepartment of Psychology, School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, UK.
Samantha HiderSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Clare JinksSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Risni Erandie Ediriweera De SilvaSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Annabelle MachinSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Zoe PaskinsSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Indiana University School of MedicineMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 22726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with inflammatory rheumatological conditions (IRCs) are at increased risk of common comorbidities including osteoporosis.

aimTo explore the barriers to and facilitators of implementing nurse-delivered fracture risk assessments in primary care, in the context of multimorbidity reviews for people with IRCs. DESIGN &

settingA multi-method qualitative study in primary care.

methodAs part of a process evaluation in a pilot trial, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients, two nurses, and three GPs. Twenty-four patient-nurse INCLUDE review consultations were audiorecorded and transcribed. A framework analysis was conducted using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

resultsNurses reported positive views about the value of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and they felt confident to deliver the assessments following training. Barriers to implementation, as identified by TDF, particularly related to the domains of knowledge, skills, professional roles, and environmental context. GPs reported difficulty keeping up to date with osteoporosis guidelines and voiced differing opinions about whether fracture risk assessment was the role of primary or secondary care. Lack of integration of FRAX into IT systems was a barrier to use. GPs and nurses had differing views about the nurse role in communicating risk and acting on FRAX findings; for example, explanations of the FRAX result and action needed were limited. Patients reported limited understanding of FRAX outcomes.

conclusionThe findings suggest that, with appropriate training including risk communication, practice nurses are likely to be confident to play a key role in conducting fracture risk assessments, but further work is needed to address the barriers identified.

Indexed as

fracturemultimorbidityosteoporosisprimary health carequalitative methodsreview

Identifiers

PMID36746471
PMCPMC10354387
OpenAlexW4319296496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.