ArticleNeuroImage2023
An attention-based context-informed deep framework for infant brain subcortical segmentation.
Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AirSeg: Learnable Interconnected Attention Framework for Robust Airway Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A multi-task segFormer framework for lesion segmentation and cerebral palsy classification based on multi-modal MRI in infant with periventricular white matter injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Baby Open Brains: An open-source dataset of infant brain segmentations.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Baby Open Brains: An Open-Source Repository of Infant Brain Segmentations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Multi-kernel Learning Fusion Algorithm Based on RNN and GRU for ASD Diagnosis and Pathogenic Brain Region Extraction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise segmentation of subcortical structures from infant brain magnetic resonance (MR) images plays an essential role in studying early subcortical structural and functional developmental patterns and diagnosis of related brain disorders. However, due to the dynamic appearance changes, low tissue contrast, and tiny subcortical size in infant brain MR images, infant subcortical segmentation is a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a context-guided, attention-based, coarse-to-fine deep framework to precisely segment the infant subcortical structures. At the coarse stage, we aim to directly predict the signed distance maps (SDMs) from multi-modal intensity images, including T1w, T2w, and the ratio of T1w and T2w images, with an SDM-Unet, which can leverage the spatial context information, including the structural position information and the shape information of the target structure, to generate high-quality SDMs. At the fine stage, the predicted SDMs, which encode spatial-context information of each subcortical structure, are integrated with the multi-modal intensity images as the input to a multi-source and multi-path attention Unet (M2A-Unet) for achieving refined segmentation. Both the 3D spatial and channel attention blocks are added to guide the M2A-Unet to focus more on the important subregions and channels. We additionally incorporate the inner and outer subcortical boundaries as extra labels to help precisely estimate the ambiguous boundaries. We validate our method on an infant MR image dataset and on an unrelated neonatal MR image dataset. Compared to eleven state-of-the-art methods, the proposed framework consistently achieves higher segmentation accuracy in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of infant MR images and also exhibits good generalizability in the neonatal dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.