Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745800›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

A resilient and connected network of sites to sustain biodiversity under a changing climate.

Mark G Anderson, Melissa Clark, Arlene P Olivero, Analie R Barnett, Kimberly R Hall, Meredith W Cornett, Marissa Ahlering, Michael Schindel, Bob Unnasch, Carrie Schloss and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ecologically informed solar enables a sustainable energy transition in US croplands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 05: Ecosystems.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A resilient and connected network of sites to sustain biodiversity under a changing climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. The past as a lens for biodiversity conservation on a dynamically changing planet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mark G AndersonCenter for Resilient Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA 0211.ORCID 0000-0001-5177-0716
Melissa ClarkCenter for Resilient Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA 0211.ORCID 0000-0002-1863-8577
Arlene P OliveroCenter for Resilient Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA 0211.
Analie R BarnettCenter for Resilient Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, Atlanta, GA 30307.
Kimberly R HallLANDFIRE, The Nature Conservancy, Lansing, MI 48906.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-3558
Meredith W CornettMinnesota Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, Duluth, MN, 55803.
Marissa AhleringMinnesota Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, Moorhead, MN 56560.ORCID 0000-0002-3913-428X
Michael SchindelOregon Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR 97214.
Bob UnnaschIdaho Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, Hailey, ID 83333.ORCID 0000-0003-3877-0687
Carrie SchlossCalifornia Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA 94105.
D Richard CameronCalifornia Field Office, The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA 94105.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-9049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivated by declines in biodiversity exacerbated by climate change, we identified a network of conservation sites designed to provide resilient habitat for species, while supporting dynamic shifts in ranges and changes in ecosystem composition. Our 12-y study involved 289 scientists in 14 study regions across the conterminous United States (CONUS), and our intent was to support local-, regional-, and national-scale conservation decisions. To ensure that the network represented all species and ecosystems, we stratified CONUS into 68 ecoregions, and, within each, we comprehensively mapped the geophysical settings associated with current ecosystem and species distributions. To identify sites most resilient to climate change, we identified the portion of each geophysical setting with the most topoclimate variability (high landscape diversity) likely to be accessible to dispersers (high local connectedness). These "resilient sites" were overlaid with conservation priority maps from 104 independent assessments to indicate current value in supporting recognized biodiversity. To identify key connectivity areas for sustaining species movement in response to climate change, we codeveloped a fine-scale representation of human modification and ran a circuit-theory-based analysis that emphasized movement potential along geographic climate gradients. Integrating areas with high values for two or more factors, we identified a representative, resilient, and connected network of biodiverse lands covering 35% of CONUS. Because the network connects climatic gradients across 250,000 biodiversity elements and multiple resilient examples of all geophysical settings in every ecoregion, it could form the spatial foundation for targeted land protection and other conservation strategies to sustain a diverse, dynamic, and adaptive world.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversityClimate ChangeHumansMovementUnited Statesbiodiversityclimate changeconnectivityconservationresilience

Identifiers

PMID36745800
PMCPMC9963216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.