Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745782›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Long-term, large-scale experiment reveals the effects of seed limitation, climate, and anthropogenic disturbance on restoration of plant communities in a biodiversity hotspot.

John L Orrock, Lars A Brudvig, Ellen I Damschen, W Brett Mattingly, Jennyffer Cruz, Joseph W Veldman, Philip G Hahn, Angela L Larsen-Gray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The past as a lens for biodiversity conservation on a dynamically changing planet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

John L OrrockDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53704.ORCID 0000-0003-0768-7389
Lars A BrudvigDepartment of Plant Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-3857-2165
Ellen I DamschenDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53704.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-0669
W Brett MattinglyDepartment of Biology, Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT 06226.ORCID 0000-0001-8181-6762
Jennyffer CruzDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53704.ORCID 0000-0002-5321-8017
Joseph W VeldmanDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258.ORCID 0000-0001-6231-8223
Philip G HahnEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-9489
Angela L Larsen-GrayNational Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Blacksburg, VA 24060.ORCID 0000-0002-7222-4201
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBoise State University · USEastern Connecticut State University · USMichigan State University · USNational Council for Air and Stream Improvement · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological restoration is essential for maintaining biodiversity in the face of dynamic, global changes in climate, human land use, and disturbance regimes. Effective restoration requires understanding bottlenecks in plant community recovery that exist today, while recognizing that these bottlenecks may relate to complex histories of environmental change. Such understanding has been a challenge because few long-term, well-replicated experiments exist to decipher the demographic processes influencing recovery for numerous species against the backdrop of multiyear variation in climate and management. We address this challenge through a long-term and geographically expansive experiment in longleaf pine savannas, an imperiled ecosystem and biodiversity hotspot in the southeastern United States. Using 48 sites at three locations spanning 480 km, the 8-y experiment manipulated initial seed arrival for 24 herbaceous plant species and presence of competitors to evaluate the impacts of climate variability and management actions (e.g., prescribed burning) on plant establishment and persistence. Adding seeds increased plant establishment of many species. Cool and wet climatic conditions, low tree density, and reduced litter depth also promoted establishment. Once established, most species persisted for the duration of the 8-y experiment. Plant traits were most predictive when tightly coupled to the process of establishment. Our results illustrate how seed additions can restore plant diversity and how interannual climatic variation affects the dynamics of plant communities across a large region. The significant effects of temperature and precipitation inform how future climate may affect restoration and conservation via large-scale changes in the fundamental processes of establishment and persistence.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemBiodiversityHumansPlantsSeedsconservationdiversitylongleaf pine ecosystemrestorationseed limitation

Identifiers

PMID36745782
PMCPMC9963678
OpenAlexW4319303894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.