Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745495›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023

The Impact of an Electronic Portal on Patient Encounters in Primary Care: Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

Karen Ferguson, Mark Fraser, Meltem Tuna, Charles Bruntz, Simone Dahrouge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring Documentation Burden in Healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Telehealth Trends and Hypertension Management Among Rural and Medicaid Patients After COVID-19.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen FergusonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-2361
Mark FraserWest Carleton Family Health Team, Carp, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7301-699X
Meltem TunaICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-7909
Charles BruntzChamplain Family Health Teams, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-4122
Simone DahrougeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-8086
University of Ottawa · CACarleton University · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic patient portals are online applications that allow patients access to their own health information, a form of asynchronous virtual care. The long-term impact of portals on the use of traditional primary care services is unclear, but it is an important question at this juncture, when portals are being incorporated into many primary care practices.

objectiveWe sought to investigate how an electronic patient portal affected the use of traditional, synchronous primary care services over a much longer time period than any existing studies and to assess the impact of portal messaging on clinicians' workload.

methodsWe conducted a propensity-score-matched, open-cohort, interrupted time-series evaluation of a primary care portal from its implementation in 2010. We extracted information from the electronic medical record regarding age, sex, education, income, family health team enrollment, diagnoses at index date, and number of medications prescribed in the previous year. We also extracted the annual number of encounters for up to 8 years before and after the index date and provider time spent on secure messaging through the portal.

resultsA total of 7247 eligible portal patients and 7647 eligible potential controls were identified, with 3696 patients matched one to one. We found that portal registration was associated with an increase in the number of certain traditional encounters over the time period surrounding portal registration. Following the index year, there was a significant jump in annual number of visits to physicians in the portal arm (0.42 more visits/year vs control, P<.001) but not for visits to nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The annual number of calls to the practice triage nurses also showed a greater increase in the portal arm compared to the control arm after the index year (an additional 0.10 calls, P=.006). The average provider time spent on portal-related work was 5.7 minutes per patient per year.

conclusionsWe found that portal registration was associated with a subsequent increase in the number of some traditional encounters and an increase in clerical workload for providers. Portals have enormous potential to truly engage patients as partners in their own health care, but their impact on use of traditional health care services and clerical burden must also be considered when they are incorporated into primary care.

Indexed as

ageclinicaleducationelectronicelectronic health recordshealth care utilizationmedical informaticsmessagingoffice visitsonline applicationspatientpatient portalsprimary caresexvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID36745495
PMCPMC9941901
OpenAlexW4313729738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.