Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745494›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool.

Elle Mizuki Fukui, Patrick G Lyons, Emily Harris, Emma K McCune, Juan C Rojas, Lekshmi Santhosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Epidemiology of Intensive Care Unit Readmissions Across Ten Health Systems.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elle Mizuki FukuiSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-1659
Patrick G LyonsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, John T Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-2787
Emily HarrisDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-8086
Emma K McCuneSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-2743
Juan C RojasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-4575
Lekshmi SanthoshDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-3462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intensive care unit (ICU)-ward transfer poses a particularly high-risk period for patients. The period after transfer has been associated with adverse events and additional work for care teams related to miscommunication or omission of information. Standardized handoff processes have been found to reduce communication errors and adverse patient events in other clinical environments but are understudied at the ICU-ward interface. We previously developed an electronic ICU-ward transfer tool, ICU-PAUSE, which embeds the key elements and diagnostic reasoning to facilitate a safe transfer of care at ICU discharge.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation process of the ICU-PAUSE handoff tool across 10 academic medical centers, including the rate of adoption and acceptability, as perceived by clinical care teams.

methodsICU-PAUSE will be implemented in the medical ICU across 10 academic hospitals, with each site customizing the tool to their institution's needs. Our mixed methods study will include a combination of a chart review, quantitative surveys, and qualitative interviews. After a 90-day implementation period, we will conduct a retrospective chart review to evaluate the rate of uptake of ICU-PAUSE. We will also conduct postimplementation surveys of providers to assess perceptions of the tool and its impact on the frequency of communication errors and adverse events during ICU-ward transfers. Lastly, we will conduct semistructured interviews of faculty stakeholders with subsequent thematic analysis with the goal of identifying benefits and barriers in implementing and using ICU-PAUSE.

resultsICU-PAUSE was piloted in the medical ICU at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, the teaching hospital of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, in 2019. As of July 2022, implementation of ICU-PAUSE is ongoing at 6 of 10 participating sites. Our results will be published in 2023.

conclusionsOur process of ICU-PAUSE implementation embeds each step of template design, uptake, and customization in the needs of users and key stakeholders. Here, we introduce our approach to evaluate its acceptability, usability, and impact on communication errors according to the tenets of sociotechnical theory. We anticipate that ICU-PAUSE will offer an effective handoff tool for the ICU-ward transition that can be generalized to other institutions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40918.

Indexed as

communicationcommunication toolhandoffICUimplementation scienceintensive caremedical educationmedical errorqualitativesociotechnical theorytransferward transferward transitionworkflow

Identifiers

PMID36745494
PMCPMC9941899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.