Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745336›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2023

Electrical Stimulation of the Auricular Branch Vagus Nerve Using Random and Alternating Frequencies Triggers a Rapid Onset and Pronounced Antihyperalgesia via Peripheral Annexin A1-Formyl Peptide Receptor 2/ALX Pathway in a Mouse Model of Persistent Inflammatory Pain.

Daiana C Salm, Verônica V Horewicz, Fernanda Tanaka, Júlia K Ferreira, Bruna H de Oliveira, Julia Maria Batista Maio, Nathalia N Donatello, Daniela D Ludtke, Leidiane Mazzardo-Martins, Aline R Dutra and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Daiana C SalmExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Verônica V HorewiczExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Fernanda TanakaExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Júlia K FerreiraExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Bruna H de OliveiraExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Julia Maria Batista MaioExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Nathalia N DonatelloExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Daniela D LudtkeExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Leidiane Mazzardo-MartinsExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Aline R DutraExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Josiel M MackExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Deborah de C H KunzlerDepartment of Physiotherapy, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Eduardo Cargnin-FerreiraFederal Institute of Santa Catarina, Campus Garopaba, Garopaba, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Afonso S I SalgadoNatural Quanta Wellness Center, Windermere, FL, USA.
Edsel B BittencourtCoastal Health Institute, Central Parkway Suite 201, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Gianluca BiancoResearch Laboratory of Posturology and Neuromodulation RELPON, Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Anna Paula PiovezanExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Franciane BobinskiExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Ari O O MoréExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Daniel F MartinsExperimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil. danielmartinsfisio@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-3167
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina · BRIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · ITQuanta Technology (United States) · USUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

CNPQ 310128/2020-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of percutaneous vagus nerve electrical stimulation (pVNS) by comparing the effects of alternating and random frequencies in an animal model of persistent inflammatory hyperalgesia. The model was induced by Freund's complete adjuvant (CFA) intraplantar (i.pl.) injection. Mice were treated with different protocols of time (10, 20, or 30 min), ear laterality (right, left or both), and frequency (alternating or random). Mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated, and some groups received i.pl. WRW4 (FPR2/ALX antagonist) to determine the involvement. Edema, paw surface temperature, and spontaneous locomotor activity were evaluated. Interleukin-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL4 levels were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. AnxA1, FPR2/ALX, neutrophil, M1 and M2 phenotype macrophage, and apoptotic cells markers were identified using western blotting. The antihyperalgesic effect pVNS with alternating and random frequency effect is depending on the type of frequency, time, and ear treated. The pVNS random frequency in the left ear for 10 min had a longer lasting antihyperalgesic effect, superior to classical stimulation using alternating frequency and the FPR2/ALX receptor was involved in this effect. There was a reduction in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase in the immunocontent of AnxA1 and CD86 in mice paw. pVNS with a random frequency in the left ear for 10 min showed to be optimal for inducing an antihyperalgesic effect. Thus, the random frequency was more effective than the alternating frequency. Therefore, pVNS may be an important adjunctive treatment for persistent inflammatory pain.

Indexed as

Annexin A1Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsElectric StimulationHyperalgesiaInflammationMicePainReceptors, Formyl PeptideVagus NerveAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnnexin A1HSH2 protein, mouseReceptors, Formyl PeptideAnnexinElectrical stimulationFrequencyHyperalgesiaInflammationVagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID36745336
OpenAlexW4319294754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.