Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745313›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2023

The reversibility of cancer radioresistance: a novel potential way to identify factors contributing to tumor radioresistance.

Yoshikazu Kuwahara, Kazuo Tomita, Mehryar Habibi Roudkenar, Amaneh Mohammadi Roushandeh, Tomoaki Sato, Akihiro Kurimasa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yoshikazu Kuwahara *Division of Radiation Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1, Fukumuro, Miyagino, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Kazuo Tomita *Department of Applied Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan. ktomita@dent.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-7948
Mehryar Habibi RoudkenarDepartment of Applied Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Amaneh Mohammadi RoushandehDepartment of Applied Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Tomoaki SatoDepartment of Applied Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan. tomsato@dent.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.
Akihiro KurimasaDivision of Radiation Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1, Fukumuro, Miyagino, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K00538Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K12326Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K12379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for radioresistance in cancer cells, we previously established clinically relevant radioresistant (CRR) cell lines from several human cancer cell lines. These CRR cells proliferate even under exposure to 2 Gy/day of X-rays for more than 30 days, which is a standard protocol for tumor radiotherapy. CRR cells received 2 Gy/day of X-rays to maintain their radioresistance (maintenance irradiation; MI). Interestingly, CRR cells that did not receive MI for more than a year lost their radioresistance, indicating that radiation-induced radioresistance is reversible. We designated these CRR-NoIR cells. Karyotyping of the parental and CRR cells revealed that the chromosomal composition of CRR cells is quite different from that of the parental cells. However, CRR and CRR-NoIR cells were more similar compared with the parental cells because CRR cells repair X-ray-induced DNA damage with higher fidelity. To identify the factor(s) involved in tumor radioresistance, previously published studies including ours have compared radioresistant cells to parental cells. In this review, we conclude that a comparison between CRR and CRR-NoIR cells, rather than parental cells, is the best way to identify factors involved in tumor radioresistance.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation ToleranceCell Line, TumorDNA DamageHumansX-RaysCancer cellMitochondriaRadioresistanceReversibility

Identifiers

PMID36745313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.