ReviewHuman cell2023
The reversibility of cancer radioresistance: a novel potential way to identify factors contributing to tumor radioresistance.
Review in Human cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inhibition of SIRT7 Overcomes Radioresistance in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Reactivating MEN1 Expression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for radioresistance in cancer cells, we previously established clinically relevant radioresistant (CRR) cell lines from several human cancer cell lines. These CRR cells proliferate even under exposure to 2 Gy/day of X-rays for more than 30 days, which is a standard protocol for tumor radiotherapy. CRR cells received 2 Gy/day of X-rays to maintain their radioresistance (maintenance irradiation; MI). Interestingly, CRR cells that did not receive MI for more than a year lost their radioresistance, indicating that radiation-induced radioresistance is reversible. We designated these CRR-NoIR cells. Karyotyping of the parental and CRR cells revealed that the chromosomal composition of CRR cells is quite different from that of the parental cells. However, CRR and CRR-NoIR cells were more similar compared with the parental cells because CRR cells repair X-ray-induced DNA damage with higher fidelity. To identify the factor(s) involved in tumor radioresistance, previously published studies including ours have compared radioresistant cells to parental cells. In this review, we conclude that a comparison between CRR and CRR-NoIR cells, rather than parental cells, is the best way to identify factors involved in tumor radioresistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36745313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.