Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745255›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Visual Peritoneal Evaluation of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients: The VIPER Study.

Barbara Costantini, Andrea Rosati, Virginia Vargiu, Vitalba Gallitelli, Chiara Di Ilio, Rossana Moroni, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara CostantiniDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea RosatiDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Virginia VargiuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise SpA, Campobasso, Italy.
Vitalba GallitelliDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Chiara Di IlioDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Rossana MoroniFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. giovanni.scambia@policlinicogemelli.it.
Anna FagottiDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy induces histopathological tumor necrosis and fibrosis which results in macroscopic tissue changes, making surgeons' intraoperative visual evaluation of the disease distribution more difficult to interpret. The aim of the study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraoperative laparoscopic visual evaluation of the diaphragmatic peritoneum and compare it with histopathological examination.

methodsPatients receiving diaphragmatic peritonectomy at time of IDS were retrospectively included. The population was grouped based on the surgeon's assessment of the diaphragmatic peritoneum during diagnostic laparoscopy. Group 1 included patients with a "visually pathologic" diaphragmatic peritoneum, and group 2 included patients with a "visually dubious" diaphragmatic peritoneum. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were calculated considering the final formalin-fixed pathology as the reference standard.

results155 patients were included (92 in group 1 and 63 in group 2). The accuracy rate of visual examination was 67.1%, the negative predictive value was 19%, specificity was 100%, and sensitivity was 64.3%.

conclusionNACT strongly affects the ability of the surgeon to discern between peritoneal scars and truly pathologic peritoneum. The diaphragmatic laparoscopic visual examination showed a low overall accuracy. We propose an algorithm that can guide the surgeon towards a more tailored approach to diaphragmatic peritonectomy during IDS.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneumCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialChemotherapy, AdjuvantCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36745255
OpenAlexW4319294564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.