Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745218›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2023

A combined model based on CT radiomics and clinical variables to predict uric acid calculi which have a good accuracy.

Zijie Wang, Guangjie Yang, Xinning Wang, Yuanchao Cao, Wei Jiao, Haitao Niu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07328932 (Development of a Precision Classification Model for Uric Acid Urinary Stones Based on Multimodal Parameters), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07328932 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Precision Classification Model for Uric Acid Urinary Stones Based on Multimodal Parameters: A Multicenter Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJian ZhuoRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,650ConditionsUrinary Tract StonesArmsNo intervention (observational study)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zijie Wang *Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16th Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266012, China.
Guangjie Yang *PET-CT Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xinning WangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16th Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266012, China.
Yuanchao CaoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16th Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266012, China.
Wei JiaoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16th Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266012, China. jiaowei3929@163.com.
Haitao NiuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16th Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266012, China. niuht0532@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a CT-based radiomics and clinical variable diagnostic model for the preoperative prediction of uric acid calculi. In this retrospective study, 370 patients with urolithiasis who underwent preoperative urinary CT scans were enrolled. The CT images of each patient were manually segmented, and radiomics features were extracted. Sixteen radiomics features were selected by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were used to model the selected features, and the model with the best performance was selected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to screen out significant clinical variables, and the radiomics features and clinical variables were combined to construct a nomogram model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), etc., were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. Among the three machine learning models, the LR model had the best performance and good robustness of the dataset. Therefore, the LR model was used to construct the nomogram. The AUCs of the nomogram model in the training set and validation set were 0.878 and 0.867, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the radiomics model and the clinical feature model. The CT-based radiomics model based has good performance in distinguishing uric acid stones from nonuric acid stones, and the nomogram model has the best diagnostic performance among the three models. This model can provide an effective reference for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

CalculiNephrolithiasisHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUric AcidUric AcidRadiomicsUric acid stonesUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.