Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36745141›Full record

ArticleDistributed, collaborative, and federated learning, and affordable AI and healthcare for resource diverse global health : Third MICCAI Workshop, DeCaF 2022 and Second MICCAI Workshop, FAIR 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Sin...2022

Towards More Efficient Data Valuation in Healthcare Federated Learning using Ensembling.

Sourav Kumar, A Lakshminarayanan, Ken Chang, Feri Guretno, Ivan Ho Mien, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Pavitra Krishnaswamy, Praveer Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Distributed, collaborative, and federated learning, and affordable AI and healthcare for resource diverse global health : Third MICCAI Workshop, DeCaF 2022 and Second MICCAI Workshop, FAIR 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Sin..., 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sourav KumarDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0352-8989
A LakshminarayananInstitute for Infocomm Research, ASTAR, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0429-8062
Ken ChangDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-5059
Feri GuretnoInstitute for Infocomm Research, ASTAR, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2549-4388
Ivan Ho MienInstitute for Infocomm Research, ASTAR, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4918-5961
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8906-9618
Pavitra KrishnaswamyInstitute for Infocomm Research, ASTAR, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-4306
Praveer SinghDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-2030

Funding

Distributed Learning of Deep Learning Models for Cancer ResearchU01CA242879 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA242879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) wherein multiple institutions collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing data is becoming popular. Participating institutions might not contribute equally - some contribute more data, some better quality data or some more diverse data. To fairly rank the contribution of different institutions, Shapley value (SV) has emerged as the method of choice. Exact SV computation is impossibly expensive, especially when there are hundreds of contributors. Existing SV computation techniques use approximations. However, in healthcare where the number of contributing institutions are likely not of a colossal scale, computing exact SVs is still exorbitantly expensive, but not impossible. For such settings, we propose an efficient SV computation technique called SaFE (Shapley Value for Federated Learning using Ensembling). We empirically show that SaFE computes values that are close to exact SVs, and that it performs better than current SV approximations. This is particularly relevant in medical imaging setting where widespread heterogeneity across institutions is rampant and fast accurate data valuation is required to determine the contribution of each participant in multi-institutional collaborative learning.

Indexed as

Data ValuationFederated LearningHealthcare AI

Identifiers

PMID36745141
PMCPMC9890952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.