Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744955›Full record

ReviewmSystems2023

Comparative Analysis of Core Microbiome Assignments: Implications for Ecological Synthesis.

Gordon F Custer, Maya Gans, Linda T A van Diepen, Francisco Dini-Andreote, C Alex Buerkle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mSystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gordon F Custer *Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-0714
Maya Gans *Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Linda T A van DiepenDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Francisco Dini-AndreoteDepartment of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
C Alex BuerkleProgram in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of a core microbiome has been broadly used to refer to the consistent presence of a set of taxa across multiple samples within a given habitat. The assignment of taxa to core microbiomes can be performed by several methods based on the abundance and occupancy (i.e., detection across samples) of individual taxa. These approaches have led to methodological inconsistencies, with direct implications for ecological interpretation. Here, we reviewed a set of methods most commonly used to infer core microbiomes in divergent systems. We applied these methods using large data sets and analyzed simulations to determine their accuracy in core microbiome assignments. Our results show that core taxa assignments vary significantly across methods and data set types, with occupancy-based methods most accurately defining true core membership. We also found the ability of these methods to accurately capture core assignments to be contingent on the distribution of taxon abundance and occupancy in the data set. Finally, we provide specific recommendations for further studies using core taxa assignments and discuss the need for unifying methodical approaches toward data processing to advance ecological synthesis.

Indexed as

Microbiotaabundanceecologymicrobiomeprevalencesimulation modeltaxon abundancetaxon occupancy

Identifiers

PMID36744955
PMCPMC9948721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.