Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744863›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

In-line swimming dynamics revealed by fish interacting with a robotic mechanism.

Robin Thandiackal, George Lauder

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robin ThandiackalHarvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-4892
George LauderHarvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-286X

Funding

National Science Foundation EFRI-830881Office of Naval Research N00014-14-1-0533Office of Naval Research N00014-18-1-2673Office of Naval Research N00014-21-1-2210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schooling in fish is linked to a number of factors such as increased foraging success, predator avoidance, and social interactions. In addition, a prevailing hypothesis is that swimming in groups provides energetic benefits through hydrodynamic interactions. Thrust wakes are frequently occurring flow structures in fish schools as they are shed behind swimming fish. Despite increased flow speeds in these wakes, recent modeling work has suggested that swimming directly in-line behind an individual may lead to increased efficiency. However, only limited data are available on live fish interacting with thrust wakes. Here we designed a controlled experiment in which brook trout,

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresSwimmingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFishesHydrodynamicsPhysical Phenomenafish schoolingfluid dynamicsin-line swimmingphysics of living systemsroboticsthrust wakes

Identifiers

PMID36744863
PMCPMC10032654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.