Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744751›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2023

Did You Get That? Predicting Learners' Comprehension of a Video Lecture from Visualizations of Their Gaze Data.

Ellen M Kok, Halszka Jarodzka, Matt Sibbald, Tamara van Gog

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Perceived intent drives gaze interpretation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  4. The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students' self-monitoring and learning in radiology.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen M KokDepartment of Education, Utrecht University.ORCID 0000-0001-9752-2531
Halszka JarodzkaDepartment of Online Learning and Instruction, Open University of the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-4703
Matt SibbaldMcMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-2370
Tamara van GogDepartment of Education, Utrecht University.
Utrecht University · NLMcMaster University · CAOpen University of the Netherlands · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In online lectures, unlike in face-to-face lectures, teachers lack access to (nonverbal) cues to check if their students are still "with them" and comprehend the lecture. The increasing availability of low-cost eye-trackers provides a promising solution. These devices measure unobtrusively where students look and can visualize these data to teachers. These visualizations might inform teachers about students' level of "with-me-ness" (i.e., do students look at the information that the teacher is currently talking about) and comprehension of the lecture, provided that (1) gaze measures of "with-me-ness" are related to comprehension, (2) people not trained in eye-tracking can predict students' comprehension from gaze visualizations, (3) we understand how different visualization techniques impact this prediction. We addressed these issues in two studies. In Study 1, 36 students watched a video lecture while being eye-tracked. The extent to which students looked at relevant information and the extent to which they looked at the same location as the teacher both correlated with students' comprehension (score on an open question) of the lecture. In Study 2, 50 participants watched visualizations of students' gaze (from Study 1), using six visualization techniques (dynamic and static versions of scanpaths, heatmaps, and focus maps) and were asked to predict students' posttest performance and to rate their ease of prediction. We found that people can use gaze visualizations to predict learners' comprehension above chance level, with minor differences between visualization techniques. Further research should investigate if teachers can act on the information provided by gaze visualizations and thereby improve students' learning.

Indexed as

ComprehensionStudentsEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansEye-trackingGazeGaze visualizationTeacher assessmentVideo lecturesWith-me-ness

Identifiers

PMID36744751
PMCPMC10078589
OpenAlexW4319294551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.