Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744702›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

The isotope distribution: A rose with thorns.

Jürgen Claesen, Alan Rockwood, Mikhail Gorshkov, Dirk Valkenborg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Automated Assignment ofJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jürgen ClaesenDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alan RockwoodDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Mikhail GorshkovV.L. Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics, N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Dirk ValkenborgI-Biostat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHasselt University · BESemenov Institute of Chemical Physics · RUUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isotope distribution, which reflects the number and probabilities of occurrence of different isotopologues of a molecule, can be theoretically calculated. With the current generation of (ultra)-high-resolution mass spectrometers, the isotope distribution of molecules can be measured with high sensitivity, resolution, and mass accuracy. However, the observed isotope distribution can differ substantially from the expected isotope distribution. Although differences between the observed and expected isotope distribution can complicate the analysis and interpretation of mass spectral data, they can be helpful in a number of specific applications. These applications include, yet are not limited to, the identification of peptides in proteomics, elucidation of the elemental composition of small organic molecules and metabolites, as well as wading through peaks in mass spectra of complex bioorganic mixtures such as petroleum and humus. In this review, we give a nonexhaustive overview of factors that have an impact on the observed isotope distribution, such as elemental isotope deviations, ion sampling, ion interactions, electronic noise and dephasing, centroiding, and apodization. These factors occur at different stages of obtaining the isotope distribution: during the collection of the sample, during the ionization and intake of a molecule in a mass spectrometer, during the mass separation and detection of ionized molecules, and during signal processing.

Indexed as

coalescencedata processingion trapisotope distribution(ultra)‐high‐resolution mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID36744702
PMCPMC11624904
OpenAlexW4319294976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.