Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744550›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2023

Automatable end-of-life screening for older adults in the emergency department using electronic health records.

Adrian D Haimovich, Wenxin Xu, Andrew Wei, Mara A Schonberg, Ula Hwang, R Andrew Taylor

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Patients' Perceptions of an Advance Care Planning Intervention in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian D HaimovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-7055
Wenxin XuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Andrew WeiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0868-2600
Mara A SchonbergDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-5922
Ula HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
R Andrew TaylorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
Translational Researchin Aging Trainnig ProgramT32AG023480 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2004 to 2024
$7.6M
Geriatrics Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.1 - AdvanCing and Expanding Dementia care (GEAR 2.1 - ACED)R33AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Ula Y Hwang, MANISH N SHAH · 2023 to 2026
$5.3M
Growing the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR 1.1) network: Expanding and sustaining an emergency care aging study infrastructure.R33AG058926 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Ula Y Hwang, Daniella Meeker · 2020 to 2026
$4.6M
Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research network 2.0 - Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0 ADC)R61AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, ULA Y, SHAH, MANISH N · 2020 to 2021
$3.0M
Research and mentoring program in shared decision making in the care of older adultsK24AG071906 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHONBERG, MARA A · 2021 to 2025
$946k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS K24 AG071906NIA NIH HHS R33 AG058926NIA NIH HHS R33 AG069822NIA NIH HHS R61 AG069822NIA NIH HHS T32 AG023480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) visits are common at the end-of-life, but the identification of patients with life-limiting illness remains a key challenge in providing timely and resource-sensitive advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care services. To date, there are no validated, automatable instruments for ED end-of-life screening. Here, we developed a novel electronic health record (EHR) prognostic model to screen older ED patients at high risk for 6-month mortality and compare its performance to validated comorbidity indices.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study of ED visits from adults aged ≥65 years who visited any of 9 EDs across a large regional health system between 2014 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression that included clinical and demographic variables, vital signs, and laboratory data was used to develop a 6-month mortality predictive model-the Geriatric End-of-life Screening Tool (GEST) using five-fold cross-validation on data from 8 EDs. Performance was compared to the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses. Reproducibility was tested against data from the remaining independent ED within the health system. We then used GEST to investigate rates of ACP documentation availability and code status orders in the EHR across risk strata.

resultsA total of 431,179 encounters by 123,128 adults were included in this study with a 6-month mortality rate of 12.2%. Charlson (AUROC (95% CI): 0.65 (0.64-0.69)) and Elixhauser indices (0.69 (0.68-0.70)) were outperformed by GEST (0.82 (0.82-0.83)). GEST displayed robust performance across demographic subgroups and in our independent validation site. Among patients with a greater than 30% mortality risk using GEST, only 5.0% had ACP documentation; 79.0% had a code status previously ordered, of which 70.7% were full code. In decision curve analysis, GEST provided greater net benefit than the Charlson and Elixhauser scores.

conclusionsPrognostic models using EHR data robustly identify high mortality risk older adults in the ED for whom code status, ACP, or palliative care interventions may be of benefit. Although all tested methods identified patients approaching the end-of-life, GEST was most performant. These tools may enable resource-sensitive end-of-life screening in the ED.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalAgedCohort StudiesDeathHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesemergency medicineend-of-lifegoals of careprognostication

Identifiers

PMID36744550
PMCPMC10258151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.