ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effects on patients with subacute vertebral fracture: a case report using an ABAB study design.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting long-term clinical mortality of elderly patients with vertebral compression fractures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility and tolerability of electrical muscle stimulation during rehabilitation in older adults with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2025Article
- Effect of electrode attachment location for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief in lumbar vertebral body fractures.Journal of physical therapy science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on trunk extension muscle strength, walking ability, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire items of gait disturbance in one case of a subacute osteoporotic vertebral fracture. [Participant and Methods] An 88-year-old female with the first and third lumbar vertebral fractures underwent standard physical therapy (A1 and A2 phases) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to the sclerotome region of the fractured vertebra (B1 and B2 phases). Assessments were performed before the A1 phase and the day after each phase. Assessment items included the Visual Analog Scale scores for pain during rest, getting up, standing up, and walking; isometric trunk extension muscle strength; walking ability (10-meter walking, continuous walking distance); and the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire items. [Results] Even though the pain intensity did not change, isometric trunk extension muscle strength, continuous walking distance, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire items of gait disturbance were improved in phase B compared to phase A. [Conclusion] Standard physical therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to the sclerotome area may improve trunk extension muscle strength, walking ability, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire items of gait disturbance in patients with subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.