Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744122›Full record

ArticleEmpirical economics2023

Governments' economic support for households during the COVID-19 pandemic and consumer confidence.

Hassan F Gholipour, Reza Tajaddini, Mohammad Reza Farzanegan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Empirical economics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassan F GholipourSchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4714-8144
Reza TajaddiniSchool of Business, Law, and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-3482
Mohammad Reza FarzaneganEconomics of the Middle East Research Group, Center for Near and Middle Eastern Studies (CNMS), School of Business and Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-3645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To combat the adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments have implemented various economic policies. This study examines how different types of government economic support for households are associated with consumer confidence. Utilizing data from 35 countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for January 2020-October 2021 and applying panel fixed effect and system generalized methods of moments regressions, we show that higher levels of government economic support lead to higher levels of consumer confidence. The results also suggest that government income support for households has a stronger impact than debt/contract relief on consumer confidence during the pandemic in the full sample. Moreover, we find that debt/contract relief is a more effective policy to boost confidence in emerging economies. Finally, COVID-19 fatalities have a significant negative effect on consumer confidence.

Indexed as

Consumer confidenceCOVID-19 pandemicDebt reliefEconomic supportIncome supportOECDSystem GMM

Identifiers

PMID36744122
PMCPMC9889238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.