Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36744045›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

The future of robotic surgery in urology: from augmented reality to the advent of metaverse.

Enrico Checcucci, Paolo Verri, Daniele Amparore, Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani, Juan Gomez Rivas, Riccardo Autorino, Alex Mottrie, Alberto Breda, Francesco Porpiglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrico CheccucciDepartment of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, 10060 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-5608
Paolo VerriDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-6828
Daniele AmparoreDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Giovanni Enrico CacciamaniCatherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, USC Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Juan Gomez RivasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Riccardo AutorinoDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-7725
Alex MottrieDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco PorpigliaDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID36744045
PMCPMC9893340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.