ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology
Diagnostic and therapeutic value of biomarkers in urosepsis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- "Uropathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in urosepsis patients at kafr el sheikh University hospital: a cross-sectional study".Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of preoperative risk factors for clinical decision-making in female upper urinary tract stones: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning algorithms for preoperative risk stratification of urosepsis after retrograde intrarenal surgery.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Procalcitonin and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Early-Stage Burn Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Machine learning model for predicting severe infection in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: multicenter retrospective study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning model integrating computed tomography radiomics and clinical features for predicting the urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Correlation of Preoperative Inflammation/Immunity Markers With Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Nisin-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells combatting nosocomialRegenerative therapy · 2024Article
- Comparison between XGboost model and logistic regression model for predicting sepsis after extremely severe burns.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Observational
- Nomogram predictive model for in-hospital mortality risk in elderly ICU patients with urosepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- PAMPs and DAMPs in Sepsis: A Review of Their Molecular Features and Potential Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The application of metagenomics, radiomics and machine learning for diagnosis of sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying key blood markers for bacteremia in elderly patients: insights into bacterial pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Influence of preoperative urine culture and bacterial species on urogenital sepsis after ureteral flexible lithotripsy in patients with upper urinary tract stones.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Correlation of procalcitonin and c-reactive protein levels with pathogen distribution and infection localization in urinary tract infections.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Dynamics of Urinary Extracellular DNA in Urosepsis.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urosepsis is sepsis caused by urogenital tract infection and is one of the most common critical illnesses in urology. If urosepsis is not diagnosed early, it can rapidly progress and worsen, leading to increased mortality. In recent years, with the increase of urinary tract surgery, the incidence of urosepsis continues to rise, posing a serious threat to patients. Early diagnosis of urosepsis, timely and effective treatment can greatly reduce the mortality of patients. Biomarkers such as WBC, NLR, PCT, IL-6, CRP, lactate, and LncRNA all play specific roles in the early diagnosis or prognosis of urosepsis. In addition to the abnormal increase of WBC, we should be more alert to the rapid decline of WBC. NLR values were superior to WBC counts alone in predicting infection severity. Compared with several other biomarkers, PCT values can differentiate between bacterial and non-bacterial sepsis. IL-6 always has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of sepsis, and CRP also has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of urosepsis. Lactic acid is closely related to the prognosis of patients with urosepsis. LncRNAs may be potential biomarkers of urosepsis. This article summarizes the main biomarkers, hoping to provide a reference for the timely diagnosis and evaluation of urosepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.