Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743976›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2023

Intradermal Injection of 100mg Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical 4% Hydroquinone for the Treatment of Melasma: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Nader Pazyar, Motahareh Babazadeh Dezfuly, Maryam Hadibarhaghtalab, Seyedeh Yasamin Parvar, Seyedeh Nasrin Molavi, Mohammad Ali Mapar, Maryam Zeinali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nader PazyarDr. Pazyar is an Assistant Professor with the Department of Dermatology at Imam Khomeini Hospital at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran.
Motahareh Babazadeh DezfulyDrs. Dezfuly and Molavi are Assistants of Dermatology with the Department of Dermatology at Imam Khomeini Hospital at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran.
Maryam HadibarhaghtalabDr. Hadibarhaghtalab and Ms. Parvar are with the Molecular Dermatology Research Center at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, Iran.
Seyedeh Yasamin ParvarDr. Hadibarhaghtalab and Ms. Parvar are with the Molecular Dermatology Research Center at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, Iran.
Seyedeh Nasrin MolaviDrs. Dezfuly and Molavi are Assistants of Dermatology with the Department of Dermatology at Imam Khomeini Hospital at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran.
Mohammad Ali MaparDrs. Mapar and Zeinali are with the Department of Dermatology at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran.
Maryam ZeinaliDrs. Mapar and Zeinali are with the Department of Dermatology at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Melasma is an acquired and chronic hyperpigmentation disorder associated with a negative impact on patients' quality of life. This study compares the efficacy of 100mg/mL intradermal TA with 4% topical HQ on female patients presenting with melasma lesions. Methods: In this randomized double-blind controlled trial, 48 women with melasma were allocated into two groups, treated with either 100mg/mL intradermal TA or topical 4% HQ. The MASI (Melasma Area and Severity Index) score was assessed by paired t-tests and repeated measured ANOVAs. The Dynamic Physician General Assessment (PGA) was also performed by taking photographs with a digital camera. Results: The average MASI score for the HQ and TA groups was 7.7 (3.0 SD) and 5.9 (2.5 SD), respectively. In both groups, the MASI decreased significantly after three months of treatment; however, the decrease was not significant between the two groups ( Limitations: First, we only used the MASI score to measure melasma degree. Second, this is a single-center study with a small sample size. Third, the before-after photos were not taken with a high-quality camera. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that both TA and continuous HQ significantly reduced the MASI score of patients without any significant differences and serious side effects. Although many treatment modalities are available for melasma, this condition is still challenging for dermatologists with a high recurrence rate after treatment.

Indexed as

dermatologyhydroquinoneMelasmaskincaretranexamic acid

Identifiers

PMID36743976
PMCPMC9891212
OpenAlexW4319294240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.