Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Implementation of five machine learning methods to predict the 52-week blood glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Xiaomin Fu, Yuhan Wang, Ryan S Cates, Nan Li, Jing Liu, Dianshan Ke, Jinghua Liu, Hongzhou Liu, Shuangtong Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaomin FuDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuhan WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ryan S CatesDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford Healthcare TriValley, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Pleasanton, CA, United States.
Nan LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing LiuClinics of Cadre, Department of Outpatient, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dianshan KeDepartment of Orthopedics, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jinghua LiuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongzhou LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuangtong YanDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: For the patients who are suffering from type 2 diabetes, blood glucose level could be affected by multiple factors. An accurate estimation of the trajectory of blood glucose is crucial in clinical decision making. Frequent glucose measurement serves as a good source of data to train machine learning models for prediction purposes. This study aimed at using machine learning methods to predict blood glucose for type 2 diabetic patients. We investigated various parameters influencing blood glucose, as well as determined the most effective machine learning algorithm in predicting blood glucose. Patients and methods: 273 patients were recruited in this research. Several parameters such as age, diet, family history, BMI, alcohol intake, smoking status et al were analyzed. Patients who had glycosylated hemoglobin less than 6.5% after 52 weeks were considered as having achieved glycemic control and the rest as not achieving it. Five machine learning methods (KNN algorithm, logistic regression algorithm, random forest algorithm, support vector machine, and XGBoost algorithm) were compared to evaluate their performances in prediction accuracy. R 3.6.3 and Python 3.12 were used in data analysis. Results: The statistical variables for which p< 0.05 was obtained were BMI, pulse, Na, Cl, AKP. Compared with the other four algorithms, XGBoost algorithm has the highest accuracy (Accuracy=99.54% in training set and 78.18% in testing set) and AUC values (1.0 in training set and 0.68 in testing set), thus it is recommended to be used for prediction in clinical practice. Conclusion: When it comes to future blood glucose level prediction using machine learning methods, XGBoost algorithm scores the highest in effectiveness. This algorithm could be applied to assist clinical decision making, as well as guide the lifestyle of diabetic patients, in pursuit of minimizing risks of hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic events.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentsalgorithmsblood glucosemachine learningprediction modeltype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36743935
PMCPMC9895792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.