Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743917›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Can probiotics enhance fertility outcome? Capacity of probiotics as a single intervention to improve the feminine genital tract microbiota in non-symptomatic reproductive-aged women.

Claudia Blancafort, Joaquín Llácer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nutrients · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Female genital tract microbiome: the influence of probiotics on assisted reproduction.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia BlancafortGinefiv Clinic, Generalife, Madrid, Spain.
Joaquín LlácerGinefiv Clinic, Generalife, Madrid, Spain.
Light Prescriptions Innovators (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications in vaginal and endometrial microbiome and microbiota have been associated with fewer implantation rates and poorest pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, its study has emerged as a new biomarker in reproductive medicine. Despite the numerous papers published on probiotic use for vaginal dysbiosis and their actual wide empiric use especially for infertile patients, there is still no clear answer to justify their recommendation. The impact of probiotics on the vaginal or endometrial microbiota has often been investigated under a symptomatic altered vaginal microbial ecosystem, such as bacterial vaginosis. However 50% of women with bacterial vaginosis are asymptomatic. Actual clinical practice guidelines clearly recommend the use of specific antimicrobial agents for the management of symptomatic vaginal infections. Assuming this should be the management as well for an infertile population, what should be the treatment for the 50% non-symptomatic women presenting unfavorable vaginal/endometrial microbiota? The aim of this review is to assess the capacity of probiotics as a single intervention to alter the feminine genital tract microbiota in non-symptomatic reproductive-aged women.

Indexed as

InfertilityMicrobiotaProbioticsVaginosis, BacterialAdultFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancyTreatment OutcomeVaginadysbiosisfertilityimplantationmicrobiomemicrobiotapregnancyprobioticsreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID36743917
PMCPMC9893107
OpenAlexW4317510119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.