ArticleCureus2023
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Severe Acute Cholecystitis: An Observational Study From a Single Institute.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Outcome Predictors of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy As Definitive Versus Bridging Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis.Cureus · 2023Article
- [Comprehensive Approach to Emphysematous Cholecystitis: A Case Series].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Although percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is generally accepted as a bridge to definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis (AC), which remains cholecystectomy, some patients did not undergo cholecystectomy, mainly due to contraindications to surgery. Here, we aimed to investigate the predictors of recurrence and the outcome after PC. Methods This is a retrospective study from a single general hospital at Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom. One hundred twenty-six patients who presented with AC grade 3 and were initially managed with PC were included. In addition, the proportion of patients who did not undergo subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and their characteristics were analyzed. Results The mean age of the study cohort was 72 (36-98) years, and the median length of drain insertion was 39.5 days. The majority (52%) presented with severe AC grade 3 with failed medical treatment to control the disease, while 7% had an emphysematous gallbladder. Eighty percent of patients did not develop any further attacks of AC after PC removal. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (35%). The mean age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score was 3.72. Thirty-six percent (45/126) of the study cohort underwent LC, while the remaining patients did not receive any surgical intervention. Nine percent were deemed unfit for surgery. Forty-one patients (33%) were managed conservatively as they did not have a further attack of cholecystitis after PC removal or had a mild attack managed with antibiotics. In addition, 22% experienced procedural complications, including a blocked stent, pain, and cellulitis around the tube. The 30-day mortality rate of patients who did not undergo LC was 5%. Predictors of interval cholecystectomy were younger age, calculus cholecystitis, low Charslson index score, and uncomplicated and shorter length of hospital stay with PC. Conclusion Most severe AC patients treated initially with PC did not undergo subsequent LC. Therefore, PC in high-surgical-risk patients with AC could be a definitive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.