ArticlePLOS global public health2022
Recruitment strategies and lessons learned from a large genetic study of African Americans.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statin Use and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Severity in Patients of African Ancestry.Research square · 2026Article
- Development of deep learning model to screen for primary open-angle glaucoma in African ancestry individuals.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Predictors of Glaucoma Conversion in an African Ancestry Cohort: A Longitudinal Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Endophenotype Guided Genome-Wide Association Study to Enhance Genetic Risk Prediction of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in African Ancestry Populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Features Associated with Visible Lamina Cribrosa Pores in Individuals of African Ancestry with Glaucoma: Primary Open-Angle African Ancestry Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Inclusion of Underrepresented Populations in Cardiovascular Genetics and Epidemiology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Polygenic Scores in the Direct-to-Consumer Setting: Challenges and Opportunities for a New Era in Consumer Genetic Testing.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic studies must enroll large numbers of participants to obtain adequate statistical power. Data are needed on how researchers can best use limited financial and practical resources to achieve these targets, especially in under-represented populations. This paper provides a retrospective analysis of the recruitment strategies for a large glaucoma genetics study in African Americans. The Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics study enrolled 10,192 African American subjects from the Philadelphia region. Major recruitment approaches included clinic enrollment from University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) sites, clinic enrollment from external sites, sampling of Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB), and community outreach. We calculated the enrollment yield, cost per subject, and seasonal trends of these approaches. The majority (65%) of subject were enrolled from UPenn sites with an average cost of $133/subject. Over time, monthly case enrollment declined as the pool of eligible subjects was depleted. Expanding to external sites boosted case numbers ($129/subject) and the biobank provided additional controls at low cost ($5/subject), in large part due to the generosity of PMBB providing samples free of cost. Community outreach was costly with low return on enrollment ($978/subject for 220 subjects). Summer months (Jun-Aug) produced the highest recruitment yields (p<0.001). Genetic studies will benefit from a multi-pronged and culturally sensitive recruitment approach. In our experience, the biobank was most cost-effective for control enrollment, while recruitment from clinics (including expansion to new sites) was necessary to recruit fully phenotyped cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.