Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Individualized surgical treatment of giant tuberculum sellae meningioma: Unilateral subfrontal approach vs. endoscopic transsphenoidal approach.

Yang Li, Chao Zhang, Jun Su, Chaoying Qin, Xiangyu Wang, Yue Li, Qing Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jun SuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Chaoying QinDepartment of Neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiangyu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNHunan Children's Hospital · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Giant tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are deeply located in the suprasellar region and extensively compressed or encased in the surrounding neurovascular structures, making gross total resection (GTR) without postoperative visual impairment challenging. The authors presented individualized unilateral subfrontal approach and endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (ETSA) in a series of patients and elaborated on their advantages and indications in resecting giant TSMs. Methods: A total of 38 patients with giant TSMs operated by a single surgeon between March 2012 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent unilateral subfrontal approach and ETSA according to preoperative imaging characteristics. Tumor characteristics, surgical details, preoperative symptoms, and neurological outcomes of TSMs patients were collected and analyzed. Results: In 31 patients operated with the unilateral subfrontal approach, total resection (Simpson grade I or II) was achieved in 27 patients (87.0%), while 6 patients (85.7%) achieved GTR in 7 patients using ETSA. The postoperative visual improvement was maintained in 22 (81.5%) and 5 patients (83.3%). Recurrence or progression was only observed in 2 (7.4%) patients operated with the unilateral subfrontal approach. There was no mortality in our series. Conclusions: Preoperative imaging and visual function are important for surgical approach selection. Maximum tumor resection and optic nerve protection can be achieved concurrently by taking advantage of these surgical approaches. The cerebral artery protection strategies and individualized surgical techniques provide great utility in improving a patient's quality of life.

Indexed as

endoscopic transsphenoidal approachskull base surgerytuberculum sellae meningiomaunilateral subfrontal approachvisual function

Identifiers

PMID36743895
PMCPMC9890549
OpenAlexW4317347361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.