ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Functional outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail in treating Charcot's arthropathy deformity.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Internal, External, and Hybrid Fixation in Hindfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A Descriptive Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.Foot & ankle international · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of intramedullary nails in Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for Charcot neuroarthropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical Management of Charcot Neuroarthropathy Involving the Hindfoot and Midfoot: A Case Series.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Charcot Neuroarthropathy Undergoing 1-Stage Screw Arthrodesis: 1-Year Follow-up.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Case Report: Arthroscopic synovectomy and loose body removal for charcot knee in an adolescent with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- [Clinical study on Ilizarov technique combined with steel needle internal fixation for 12 patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy of foot and ankle].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Management of hindfoot and ankle in Charcot arthropathy.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment of distal tibia non-unions with a retrograde intramedullary nail as a therapy option to prevent amputation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or hindfoot fusion is a salvage surgical option used to treat symptomatic or severe deformity as a result of Charcot's arthropathy. It is an internal fixation that utilizes nails to stabilize the hindfoot after surgical correction of the deformity. This study intends to measure the change in functional outcomes of patients with Charcot's arthropathy using this technique and the time taken to achieve fusion. Method: This study presents a series of 40 cases of Charcot's arthropathy where hindfoot fusion was done using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail. A retrospective analysis was done where these patients' functional scores had been evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (serially) with the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Foot Function Index (FFI). Along with its complication, the length of time required for the fusion is also reported. Results: This study consists of 40 patients (13 men, 27 women; mean age 60.5 years; age range 52-68 years) with a mean follow-up of 64 months (range 24-108 months). The mean time taken for fusion was 5.1 months. All patients showed improvement in functional scoring (SF-36, AOFAS, FFI, and FAOS) postoperatively. We establish that the improvements were gradual over 2 years. Approximately 37.5% of patients had a minor complication and 2.5% had a major complication. Conclusion: Hindfoot fusion using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail results in improved functional outcome with an acceptable fusion time and acceptable complication rate. Level of evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.