ReviewEuropean clinical respiratory journal2023
Does the time to diagnosis and treatment influence outcome in adults with pleural infections.
Review in European clinical respiratory journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pleural fluid agitation for improving the microbiologic diagnostic yield in pleural infection: a feasibility study.Respiratory research · 2025Trial
- Concurrent versus sequential intrapleural administration of fibrinolytic and DNase for pleural infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Causative pathogens and clinical outcomes of pleural infection in patients without and with indwelling pleural catheters - a retrospective study from a Danish pleural clinic.European clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Association between serial changes in serum C-reactive protein levels and mortality among patients with pleural empyema: a database research.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Pleural Infection: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Serotype 3 pneumococcal pleural empyema: a case report and review of the epidemiology.European clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of early diagnosis and intervention in adult patients with complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion or pleural empyema and the impact on outcomes. Methods: A systematic review based on a literature search of the PubMed database was performed. Results: Eleven eligible studies were included; nine observational studies and two randomised controlled trials totalling a study population of 10,717 patients. The studies were conducted from 1992 to 2018, all in Europe and Northern America except one. Results varied between studies, but a trend towards better outcome in patients with shorter duration of symptoms and quicker initiation of treatment was found. We found that duration of symptoms before treatment may affect length of hospital stay, rate of conversion to open surgery, and frequency of complications. Conclusion: We found that an earlier intervention in adults suffering from complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and pleural empyema may potentially improve the outcome of patients in terms of length of stay, conversion to open surgery, and general complications following treatment, but not regarding mortality. Further studies are required to specify the timing of each intervention, and direct comparison in early management of interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.